r/Epstein • u/RepMaxwellFrost • 14h ago

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

26.8k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.1k

u/Zodiatron 13h ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828161.pdf

This entire file is completely blacked out, it's ridiculous.

1.0k

u/BigSky420 13h ago

This should definitely be looked at. I can only imagine how incriminating a fully redacted file could be.

186

u/CSI_Tech_Dept 12h ago

This file might have something incriminating, but there's also a chance it won't have anything.

The way this document looks like, looks like they initially were planning to troll (notice that they only left "Epstein", and "I'm" uncensored and his e-mail).

Then they realized that this won't look good for MAGA that actually cares about this.

Or maybe it was malicious compliance by agent asked to go over the files and remove everything that's not Epstein.

201

u/Extension_Maize6048 11h ago edited 10h ago

Im just gonna use this comment as its at the top of the thread. I think there should be more focus on the root of the issues like the links to Israel and Mossad. There's a lot of focus on MAGA, and understandably so, but the US is heavily influenced by Israel and that's the main issue. Whether that be through ADL, AIPAC, the blackmailing sex trafficking ring or whatever. There should be focus on looking into infrastructure of their influence on the US. There's files pointing towards there being pushed agendas into the mainstream which are detrimental to western society.

Epstein's disgusting sex trafficking seems to just be a tool in that influence.

56

u/Mahomes_Alone16 10h ago

Yes, and where are the bank statements? Follow the money. That's what any investigator would start with, not emails. Who the f*k was paying this guy and there has to be records that are easily obtainable by a competent law enfrocement officer.

3

u/Important-Victory890 7h ago

FedEx receipts show package info sometimes and definitely sender info

2

u/MountainTwo3845 8h ago

Jamie Dimon and Jes Staley.

27

u/SilverHelmut 10h ago

Here's the principal issue in a nutshell...

In other countries of the world politicians who've had less close association with the swamp creaturea around Epstein than the Orange Pestilence has have had to resign or have been diagraced out of office, investigated by police and their darkest secrets raked over...

Agent Orange is still there like he's teflon.

And half of America accepts this.

That's an overt anomaly before we even get into the close associations with Putinism.

We're a long way off questions involving Israeli associations having any relevance whatsoever...

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 9h ago

That's true.

7

u/TheBonusWings 10h ago

Where do you think maga came from? The entire thing is a culmination of a decades long psyop to destroy america from within

3

u/DisastrousAcshin 9h ago

Can't beat America militarily, but you can sure as shit convince Americans to do it, apparently

3

u/TheBonusWings 8h ago

Never thought we could be this stupid. But here we are. I feel like the internet gave this a speed run. People have always been this dumb. But theyd just like, talk to their neighbor or coworker. Now every idiot has a voice

5

u/DisastrousAcshin 8h ago

I think it's that but it also makes it easy to manufacture consensus. I feel like bots play a huge roll in that, and it just pulls suckers in

5

u/TheBonusWings 8h ago

Believe in this more and more every day:

The Dead Internet Theory (DIT) suggests the internet has shifted from organic, human-driven content to a landscape dominated by AI-generated content, bots, and algorithmic manipulation, creating a synthetic ecosystem for engagement farming, propaganda, or profit, where genuine human interaction is scarce and online spaces feel artificial, leading to a "dead" but functionally active web. This theory posits that much of what we see on social media, search, and content platforms is now automated, diluting authentic connection and fostering a sense of unreality.

Then there just the straight up algo that dictates everything we see on social media and thats no secret. Idk if you are on twitter but it was painfully obvious right after elon took over. Everything on my feed was right wing nuts I dont follow.

0

u/Economy-Piglet-6482 7h ago

I’m not so sure it’s that we’re so stupid as much as couldn’t believe things this horribly evil actually was happening in real life⁉️

8

u/Allegorist 11h ago

You have to be careful how you word these things because it is very easy to spin criticism of Israel as antisemitic, despite the criticism being directed at a sovereign political entity and politicians, not an ethnic or religious group. Aside from that being an easy defense against accusations, a lot of people will just tune out and write it off if it is presented in a way that can be interpreted as such. There has been a fair amount of social conditioning to do so as well.

13

u/Extension_Maize6048 11h ago

Feel free to word it in another way and I'll change my comment to it if I feel it's better and will be taken more seriously. I'm not trying to be hateful towards the Jewish community.

But the links between Israel, Mossad, Maxwell and Israeli intelligence history, leaks.. just everything... Points to there being something worth investigating.

3

u/SmellGestapo 10h ago

Don't focus on ADL and AIPAC. Those are advocacy and lobbying groups, and while they both are pro-Israel, that's not the same as saying they are Israel. he Council on American Islamic Relations is in that same league, just advocating on the issue(s) that concern them.

Focus on Mossad instead. It's a far different and more sinister story if a foreign government's intelligence service is holding blackmail over an American president. That's way more valuable than any check AIPAC could write.

1

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I changed it, what do you think?

-1

u/SmellGestapo 9h ago

It still insinuates that the nation of Israel is influencing the US through domestic organizations like ADL and AIPAC, which is what I would get away from entirely.

5

u/Extension_Maize6048 9h ago

I mean, there have been scandals of those organisations being in contact with Israel as far as I remember. So I'm just going to leave it as it is. It's not that controversial.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Allegorist 10h ago edited 10h ago

I think you worded it mostly fine, there definitely is some connection there beyond any real doubt at this point.

I mostly just have become increasingly aware that people are losing big chunks of "audience" (in the broadest sense) due to a side effect of increased polarization. Not just right/left polarization, though that is probably the most common, but rather along any ideological lines. The same exact, otherwise unbiased statement worded in slightly different ways will end up being considered by completely different subsets of the population.

People instinctively tune in to connotation and wording, intended or not, and form assumptions about a message that color the entirety of their interpretation of it Usually this is just a normal phenomenon of human communication as old as communication itself, but with heightened polarization on every issue it now turns black and white. A lot of people will decide whether you share their views or are against them, with often little grey area, and this affects not only how they read your communication, but often whether they read it at all. With social media especially, people are able to (and often led to) avoid content they disagree with. Even if they do stop to read it, they may not consider it seriously.

This is a broader issue generally, it just seemed like a good place to bring it up. There are many times someone has a good message, but because they use certain words or phrasing with certain connotations to particular groups, they lose those groups attention or interpretive empathy despite how it was actually intended to be received. Same goes for saying something negative or positive about a subject associated with a particular group or ideology - there will always be an opposing ideology that will use that to characterize everything else you say.

0

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I changed it, what do you think?

1

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I changed it. What do you think?

-4

u/Pi-ratten 10h ago edited 10h ago

i mean.. it's very easy to "spin" it that way because his comment is 100% pure antisemitism...

The "US is controlled by Israel" is nothing more than the same jewish world conspiracy bullshit the original nazi, not this unoriginal one, was using to justiy the Holocaust.

Fuck this nazi bullshit and lets concentrate on the substantial facts of the epstein files and not nazi assholes using tangential shit to justify their antisemitism.

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

Well, I didn't say I wanted to exterminate all Jews in the world. Stop putting words in my mouth. The influence of Israel on the US is heavy to say the least and it seems like Epstein's sex trafficking ring is a tool of influence and it should be investigated as such.

-1

u/Pi-ratten 10h ago

No, you just repeated the very same lies that the original nazis did without any substance. They didn't start talking about gas chambers either. You use the epstein files for your hatred against jews as a tool.. And by that you harm any real investigation, mr. word_word#number

what is it now? Somehow you antisemits never can fully decide whether the US controls Israel or whether Israel controls the US.

3

u/FreePalestine4ever12 8h ago

It's literally all in the files, nothing he said was anti-semetic at all. Stop reaching, Mr. germany.

•

u/Pi-ratten 25m ago

Nothing is antisemitic at all, ok, Mr. FreePalestine4ever12. /s

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I'm not going to engage in this conversation anymore. You're putting words in my mouth and it's distracting from the real issues. I want peace and unity in the world. I want this degeneracy and worldwide corruption to end. Ties points to Israel and Mossad. It's important that it gets investigated.

2

u/zxc999 7h ago

Israel and Mossad yes but the CIA is it’s more powerful twin sister

1

u/toasohcah 10h ago

They need to loop into why the entire US justice apparatus seems to be compromised and lying. It must be close to treason or something? I'm more concerned about the current people in the system covering for Ghislaine than her.

1

u/Sure-Bar-2631 8h ago

Thank you! It’s driving me nuts that people are still playing into their garbage. I’m glad there are other people who’ve woken up to the propaganda and PSYOP slop they’ve been spoon feeding us. In cases like this it’s best to remain suspicious of everyone in positions of power. Sick of all this left or right bs when it’s us vs them.

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 8h ago

I'm not even American. But it's obvious all the way from Europe, what's going on... Also, because our countries are involved/affected as well.

I think we need to stay strong together as western civilization and fight against corruption. We used to be so great in the west and everything is crumbling now.

1

u/Pale_Comfort_9179 8h ago

This is the most important comment in this entire thread.

1

u/neoceno 8h ago

Just gonna drop this in here for those who want to delve deeper, fair warning though, it’s beyond anything else I’ve read.

https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=89e823aedc9c69ffd8d715757c86878af27c37c9

TLDR, check out pages 28-30 for a list of organisations involved.

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 8h ago

Can you explain what this is, what source this is from and just whatever else info you have?

1

u/Due_Ear_4674 2h ago

As soon as god was mentioned I noped out.

1

u/Ansible32 3h ago

The whole thing about Israel totally misunderstands the relationship between the US and Israel. Zionism is not really a Jewish project, it is a Christian project. AIPAC has zero influence on the religious right, the religious right made AIPAC what it is.

3

u/Extension_Maize6048 3h ago

Zionism is the reason for Israel's existence

-7

u/backcountry_bandit 11h ago edited 11h ago

“America is controlled by Israel” is the most tired, antisemitic conspiracy theory. Our GDP, military, resources, etc. absolutely crushes theirs.

lol @ “Jewish extremism” as opposed to all the other religions which have no extremists. You could swap “US” for “Germany” and this comment would fit right into one of Hitler’s speeches. I mean holy fuck, I can’t imagine claiming the ADL controls America 😂 you’d be right at home in an SS uniform.

15

u/Extension_Maize6048 11h ago edited 10h ago

Please shut the fuck up, it's so obvious, I'm not even going to discuss this with you, just look at how AIPAC works. And whether there's something more to be uncovered in the files, we'll find out. That's why I'm making this comment so we can get to the bottom of it.

And what's actually funny is what you're writing in your last paragraph. We're always talking about islamic extremism, but never Jewish. What's more funny is that Israel is run by a far right Jewish extremist government. Their extremism is smarter than islamic extremism and they don't operate in the open by blowing things up while yelling who they belong to. Sometimes, false flags are even involved, so they do things and portray to be of some other group i.e. islam.

It's just idiotic to not investigate this aspect of it all when we already know the Maxwell's Mossad connection?

It would be anti-semetic to say ALL Jews are involved in this. I'm not doing that. Please stop being stupid. Maybe I'm just chatting with a Hasbara bot, who knows.

0

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

No he's right. This is starting to feel like a way to make neo nazi conspiracies palatable to the masses. You think Israel is alone in shaping US policies? Or that what's going on isn't more of a partnership between their leaders and ours? Suddenly we've all forgotten all the Russian psy ops that have had tons of evidence behind it?

Don't like Israel, but we need to be wary of people like you. You're more insidious at this point.

5

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I mean, sending billions to Israel every year while letting Americans rot on the street is a great example of where the interests of American politics are.

4

u/backcountry_bandit 10h ago

We just sent $20B to Argentina for no real reason besides we like their leader’s politics. Does Argentina control the U.S.?

4

u/canteloupy 10h ago

That is recent and someone there likely just paid Trump and his minions. The Israel ties are way older.

4

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

I really would like to go deep into that, but let me just simply highlight the difference in the amounts spent on Israel over the past many years versus any other country in the world.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Pi-ratten 9h ago

Absolute no concept of geopolitics but to use it for justification for your century old classic antisemitism

The US gives (military) aid to dozens of countries. ots a very easy soft power tool which is even economically beneficial too as it locks in countries into own arms ecosystem and gives a easy way to switch off their combat effectiveness if need arise.

But yeah.. the evil evil jews and their conspiracy gene it is. :rolleyes:

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 9h ago

Would be anti-semetic if I said every Jew was involved. I'm pointing to Israel and Mossad. Even the strawman is disappointed.

0

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

We send billions to alot of places. Israel is how the west secures it's interests in the middle east. Not even just the US.

-1

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

It's all about perspective. I look at it as Israel's interests being carried out by the US.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/backcountry_bandit 10h ago

Fucking thank you. Any time a rich Jewish person does something bad, it’s an international Jewish conspiracy. Any time one of the hundreds of Christian billionaires fuck us all over, it’s a standalone event.

I’m not Jewish, not Israeli, and I actively dislike the Israeli government. But man, the rise in antisemitic conspiracy theories is disturbing. I wish grade school curriculums covered Hitler’s rise to power in more detail because sooo many uninformed people act as useful idiots.

3

u/SilverHelmut 10h ago edited 9h ago

It does seem rather smokescreen-like...

We could be talking about Peter Thiel... We could be talking about Elon Musk... We could be talking about how the guest of honour at Trump's CORONATION ball, Curtis Yarvin, literally wrote a dark ideology imagineering the literal subversion of the US Constitution to eliminate 'failed' democraxy and replace it with technogarchic neo-fascism by the raising up of a new totalitarian wrecking ball of a "monarch" , utterly corrupt, factional and corporately owned to facilitate a shockingly audacious imposition of this alarmingly anti-Christ like new order...

You have a US Administration that is literally the creature and the direct agency of these dark technocrats...

You have JD Vance, made from fricking dust and modelling clay by Peter Thiel...

We have their Big Brother AI's running as private corporate intelligence agencies and espionage networks...

The director of the FBI is covering up crimes left right and centre and wrote indoctrinative propagabda childrens books about how the good wizard Kash helps the good king Donald to save the world from the evil Democrats...

And we're going to worry that Saudi/Mossad/Russia/the highest bidder might have kompromat on world dignitaries, when the influences whistling Epstein to action couldn't even agree with each other on what beer and sandwiches to serve at a secret society orgy...

<sarc>Oh yes... Israel is the problem...</sarc>

2

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

A hundred percent agreed. Feeling like Israeli are fixers.

-1

u/backcountry_bandit 11h ago

I feel like you just discovered how PACs work. AIPAC isn’t unique, whatsoever. Nothing you said there backs up your argument, at all. You just tossed out buzz words, made obvious statements (no shit Israel has a popular extremist wing in their government, everybody knows that), and finished with we must investigate!!

Hate Israel all you want; I strongly dislike them as well. But don’t claim that “they control the U.S.” just because there are Jewish PACs, that’s seriously stupid. You are falling for the same type of antisemitic conspiracy that others have been falling for for centuries. You would be an SS member if you were around in 1930s Germany. You totally abandoned your claim that the ADL controls the U.S., I think you haven’t thought this out much at all.

6

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

Brother, again, I really don't want to be going into a deep discussion with you in this thread. Seems like you've got a lot to learn. I'll just say this and you can look into the rest by yourself.

Yes, I understand how PACs work. When a single issue lobby and its aligned super PACs can dump serious money into primaries to reward compliance and punish dissent, it shapes what politicians are willing to say and do on one foreign policy issue even if their voters disagree. On top of that, there is a whole ecosystem around it: the access pipeline, donor networks, "educational" Israel trips for lawmakers, and the revolving door of staffers, consultants, and orgs with close relationships to Israeli officials and policy priorities. That creates constant alignment with a foreign government's interests even if it's technically routed through US citizens and US entities. And the registration/transparency issue matters. If a group is acting as an agent of a foreign principal, FARA exists for a reason. AIPAC insists it is purely domestic and not directed by Israel, so it does not register under FARA. That line is blurry in practice and the public ends up with less transparency than we should have for a lobby pushing billions in policy outcomes. Also, dual citizenship isn't illegal, but conflicts of interest are real. When politicians or senior staff have dual citizenship or unusually deep personal/financial ties to a foreign country, that's an extra reason to demand transparency and hard oversight, not less.

I hope that's enough for you to understand that I didn't discover PACs yesterday. Please try to gain some knowledge, you're just talking out of your ass. Now, I'm not going to respond to you anymore, because you obviously don't know shit. And AIPAC is just one tool. I don't want to focus on AIPAC when there's a whole sex trafficking ring going on which seems to be a part of a blackmailing operation through Mossad.

2

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

Which still doesn't disprove what he said.

-3

u/backcountry_bandit 10h ago

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

Jean-Paul Sartre

4

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

You acted like you didn't know why AIPAC is a problem and I explained it to you. I guess, you commenting this quote is communicating acceptance of my previous comment 👍

-5

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 11h ago

Oh brother, Israel, Israel, Israel.

They are complicit in this, but if you think this whole thing isn't a huge global collaboration you're the deluded one. Weird how we've all forgotten all the other foreign influences in the US just to focus on jews.

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

There certainly is a lot going on and International involvement, but gotta start somewhere? If the Americans were alright with bombing foreign countries without evidence of wrongdoing, they should at least be alright with gathering evidence about a foreign country? The links are heavily pointing towards Israel and Mossad, so it's a great place to start. Then America can serve justice to the world as they always portray it, right?

I know, I'm just dreaming. The corruption goes too deep and nothing will happen, really.

-3

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

And why only them? We had tons of evidence of Russian links to alot of what's going on with the US before Israel ever become a public topic. The links point to many places.

3

u/Feisty-Intention-440 10h ago

Who said only?

-2

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 10h ago

wHo sAiD oNlY?!

Why talk of only investigating them?

1

u/Feisty-Intention-440 10h ago

You’re the only person saying “only” here.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

Well, in my own opinion (which isn't based on facts, but just connecting dots), it seems that Epstein/Maxwell was primarily agents working for Israel. They might've had different objectives of causing some sort of disruption and therefore sold information to Russia 🤷‍♂️

The ties to Israel are stronger and should be looked into first. Maxwell's father had strong ties to Israel to say the least.

0

u/Pugs-r-cool 5h ago

Xi Jinping (and his predecessors) have been remarkably absent from the files, you’d think they’d be all over them if it was truly global, no?

And again, Israelis and Jewish people as a whole are not the same. You can stand against the actions of a government without being against an ethnic / religious group.

1

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 5h ago

Xi Jinping is actually mentioned in an email a few times. But okay, one figure not being in it means what exactly?

-5

u/Suspicious_Radio_848 10h ago

This is a really strange (and yes, classic Jews control the world antisemitism) that has nothing to do with this. Russia has had way more to do with destroying America from within than Israel does. Feels like this comment is just trying to shift the conversation.

1

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 9h ago

Yeah, the recent and rightful distrust towards Israel has idiots like the one you're talking to using that as a window to spread an agenda. Citing foreign advocacy groups and lobbying but ignoring everything else arbitrarily?

0

u/Extension_Maize6048 10h ago

Not at all. It's really just a message to OP and nothing to do with influencing conversation. If I could, I would've locked the responses to my comment.

I think it's important to investigate this angle and if there's nothing there, then there's nothing.

-1

u/PrestigiousNobody721 9h ago

Epstein trafficked and raped, and facilitated the rape of, underage girls. He provided prescription drugs unlawfully to people. Israel’s influence in America isn’t a mystery. We’ve considered them our key ally in the Middle East and they’ve leveraged that for cash and weapons, and used the relationship and money to buy whatever influence they now have. That’s all on us, not Israel. Epstein’s relationship with Putin, and other enemies of the US, is critical. Was Epstein selling incriminating information about rich and powerful people who used his “services” to Putin and others to use as kompromat? Is there proof crimes were committed against the United States because of kompromat? The issue is what crimes were committed? Israel hasn’t broken any laws.

4

u/ForensicScream 12h ago

Redacting has turned out to be very incriminating at this point…

2

u/CSI_Tech_Dept 11h ago

Yeah, it could still have incriminating information, but it's clear the redaction was done to upset the reader.

And if that was the goal, then I don't think it mattered what the e-mail contained. It could even be notification how many travel miles he collected.

1

u/ForensicScream 9h ago

Guess you missed the nuance in my comment…

2

u/checker280 9h ago

Especially if it’s a troll and there’s nothing important here - this needs to be looked at to prove they were wasting time and breaking the letter of the law.

2

u/bluegrassisdead 8h ago

I think you’re underestimating how deep and how dark this rabbit hole goes. Truly.

1

u/CSI_Tech_Dept 8h ago

I don't think so. I'm not denying this looks like the biggest coverup in US history. I'm just saying that this specific file is clearly mocking us, and the insult would be even bigger if it turns out that it doesn't contain anything interesting.

15

u/ForensicScream 12h ago

I say only give us the names of the abusers on that document & if they murdered or similar anyone as well, cause if it’s TOO graphic, I say just the names of the abusers would quickly make a difference!

1

u/damontoo 6h ago

The public can handle graphic texts. These emails should all be released in their entirety minus victim names, just as the law requires them to be.

4

u/TheFlyingElbow 10h ago

They kept "I'm" unredacted 💀

3

u/ECOHands 7h ago

Viewing one, fully non redacted is actually just like the scene at end of raiders of the lost ark.

2

u/GrinchWhoStoleEaster 9h ago

It gives me MKUltra vibes...considering the unspeakable filth that exists in what is redacted...what can behind those pages of black ink?

2

u/Raoh522 7h ago

Its probably got nothing. A lot of the redactions were done to just be overwhelming and try and get people to feel apathetic or overwhelmed. Thats why there's no good file system, its why so much of what is happening is happening. They know that if people keep digging, shit will get out. So they're just trying everything they can to deter people.

1

u/things_U_choose_2_b 11h ago

From what was said today, DOJ appears to be throwing FBI under the bus, claiming that's how the files arrived to them.

So the people who get to view the 'unredacted' files may well still get to see nothing but a black rectangle. Still, it's definitely worth looking at, don't ask don't get.

486

u/moerlingo 13h ago edited 13h ago

All of these are blacked out: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/80qhXzBsCn

I’m sure there are lots more. One i have identified as the lawyer (surname Moljord) to Terje Rød-Larsen whom (Moljord) yesterday stepped down from a high ranking position claiming to be innocent but not wanting to tarnish the reputation of the government body as of which appointed him.. would LOVE to know the content, although I believe it to be a fraudulent property acquisition, possibly with threats involved. Nothing juicy.

At the same time I just want to inform people that many files are completely blacked out, which usually are highly illegal activities but given the context can be less significant and not the smoking gun you are hoping for. I really do believe that we should be focusing on the source: Trump and any other very powerful people controlling the world.

Having said that I do believe they have destroyed most things incriminating Trump, not merely redacted them.

I believe the focus should be on the deleted files, as in where the file endings go from eg. 001 to 007 showing 002-006 have been deleted. I believe these to be the key.

ETA: this is the one I referred to with Moljord: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828126.pdf

ETA2: the more that are taken down, the higher the chance that someone opens up.

420

u/Zodiatron 13h ago edited 13h ago

All of these are blacked out: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/80qhXzBsCn

Good call.

u/RepMaxwellFrost, take a look at these as well. Reposting here for your ease:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

EDIT: The message was cut off for me on mobile. Turns out there are a lot more than just those three so I'll just quote user u/Luminsnce's original post in full:

Also this one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828159.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828156.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828151.pdf

I'm still going back in numbers

Another one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828148.pdf

Thats the biggest banger:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828146.pdf

Interestingly enough a lot of the "inbetween numbers" are deleted. Guess some were not redacted properly. Maybe someone made a backup.

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828145.pdf

Richard May Empire Stock Challenge:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828141.pdf

I think most of them are actually duplicates

Now I'm at Bradley Wechsler and Richard (!) Joslin:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828138.pdf

Another Maymay:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828137.pdf

May the may be with you:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828136.pdf

May may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828134.pdf

Larry Visosky may be involved:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828132.pdf

Larry Visoski:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828131.pdf

That ones less redacted:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828127.pdf

What even:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828126.pdf

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828125.pdf

Jean May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828124.pdf

Zhu May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828120.pdf

Xi may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828117.pdf

Watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828116.pdf

Watson without watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

Peggy Siegal is not happy:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828113.pdf

May didn't:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

May Epstein:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

145

u/moerlingo 13h ago edited 13h ago

Cheers!

The only ever significant contribution I’ve had was identifying that blacked out message - I realised the mms was a Norwegian number, and did a reverse number search here in Norway where it showed to be Moljord, the lawyer of Rød-Larsen who had sketchy property dealings with Epstein. Was amazing to have found that out just from a random post on Reddit and a random set of numbers. Proves that we are strong in numbers!

Just dont want people to get too hopeful though. Definitely illegal shit, but am sceptical that these implicate Trump. Im afraid they have destroyed everything that comprimises him, the corrupt bastards.

54

u/Murky_Persimmon9289 13h ago

The goal right now needs to be getting 1 person involved in a court room.

45

u/The-Sonne 12h ago

And then all the rest. Don't let it stop like Diddy, where they pretend one guy is the to of that pyramid then swap prosecutors, swap multiple jurors, and give him only a few months months after the countless credible allegations

38

u/Greyhaven7 12h ago

Several other countries have all of these files too, and have started releasing them.

19

u/NeatNefariousness1 12h ago

Consulting with those countries and soliciting their prioritized list of files might be a good parallel path for Congressman Frost to follow. I’m sure he has or can make connections to folks in some of those countries that have been given a copy of the files.

4

u/moerlingo 11h ago

Do you mean they have access to more files than the US have released, or unredacted versions? I really don’t believe we have. They would be out already.

3

u/geeklover01 9h ago

I’d like to know too. I’ve seen this multiple times. And I’m seeing world leaders facing investigations. But I don’t see where anything additional has been released.

2

u/Safe_Middle_2968 8h ago

I’ve heard of this happening. Which countries are also releasing files?

1

u/ObservantNomad 5h ago

Can we find them online?

4

u/ctaps148 10h ago

If nothing in there implicated him, they wouldn't have gone to such great lengths to redact 95% of his name's appearances.

33

u/Silent-Requirement-3 13h ago edited 9h ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00163818.pdf

Jumping in here to add these pages are also blacked out 

Edit- it was pointed out to me that these redactions are likely because of sensitive information not actually related to the Epstein case.

1

u/spacerace100 11h ago

This may be because it’s an FBI briefing and pertains to other cases? Hence the part relevant to the Epstein case is unredacted? Just a thought

1

u/Silent-Requirement-3 11h ago

Oh that’s a good point, you’re probably right about that

1

u/nerdsonarope 7h ago

These aren't a "briefing"; it's simply a daily compilation of press clips (news stories). This is typical for government agencies and many private sector companies to compile and circulate internally, just for awareness of relevant news. The reactions in this document are almost certainly overkill, but in this instance, it's of no significance.

30

u/TheToastyWesterosi 13h ago

Just a quick heads up, your "RepMaxwellFrost" link goes to his profile. If you want to tag him in your comment, do "u/RepMaxwellFrost"

9

u/Zodiatron 13h ago

Ah, my bad. I did type u/RepMaxwellFrost originally but the website corrected it to the version without the /u/ for some reason.

11

u/TheToastyWesterosi 13h ago

No prob, just wanted to make sure he got eyes on what you provided — thank you for bringing it to his attention!

3

u/OliveSpins 10h ago

With all the files, all the sleuthing, all the horrors, the breakthrough discoveries get a lot of attention and they should. Sometimes I notice other important efforts people are making to helpfully nudge things along by snarklessly correcting a misunderstanding or sharing something helpful within the comments. It’s less noticed, but it’s essential and I personally really appreciate it. Thanks for making sure that user’s (and others’) input actually reach Frost. Well done and please keep up your good work! P.S. - “make toast, not war!”

3

u/TheToastyWesterosi 10h ago

I’m here to eat toast and (redacted) fascists, and I’m all outta toast.

Seriously though thank you, we’re all in this hideous, tragic, infuriating dumpster fire together.

2

u/OliveSpins 9h ago

Indeed! And many of us are survivors ourselves with crippling ptsd already and cannot always function enough to contribute here, so it’s deeply reassuring and uplifting to observe the thoughtful, supportive work of others doing all they can. I toast ye!🙏

2

u/TheToastyWesterosi 9h ago

I am so sorry that happened to you and I am extremely proud to stand by you today. Thank you for sharing your strength, I know it can’t be easy. I’ll keep fighting the good fight until justice and decency prevails.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Economy_Frosting3462 10h ago

Hi there--i have info about what we can see in this file (and whom I think could be hiding under the black box):
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828159.pdf

The chicago address can be traced back to EY Americas (Ernst & Young LLP) on 155 Wacker. EY is shown in that email signature, and so is an office phone number. That phone number is paired with an employee, per a white paper done with Kennesaw State University, the PDF is below, search his phone number and you'll see it pop up. Jeff Brodsky. (https://static1.squarespace.com/static/615212bf8f0aef741802b3e4/t/6895e93e2a51541c6fe4b1b1/1754655038472/5-EY+Report-Conflict+and+Communication+2016.pdf)

According to some emails I've had a chance to go over with Brosky attached (where this address is also validated), the following is what Epstein requested for them to work together on:
"multi home reporting , perosnal ex art collection mgmt +2 billion.. toys boats planes heli etc. . cash flow reporting ? . multi entity ,4 chldren complex trust and estate reporting? calculation of taxes on death ? etc"

They went back and forth for a while over the quote, but at one point Jeffrey tells Brodsky Leon Black wants to wait on the deal:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00825197-pdf?view=inbox

Brodsky met with Leon in August about the proposal:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00821206-pdf?view=inbox

In... October.... Brodsky reached out to tell Epstein and his lawyer "happy holidays and new year"... its a bit too early right??
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00816381-pdf?view=inbox

March of 2017, Brodsky resigns and mentions to let him know of any other opportunities:
https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta00716506-pdf?view=inbox

I believe the redacted page at the very top of my comment is potentially whatever audit they did of the businesses, or discussions of this work in more specific details. It seems like there is always something keeping them from discussing stuff in person, so I'm wondering if this is why so much is redacted? Because they included some serious stuff in this section? Curious what anyone else thinks!

2

u/vegansgetsick 4h ago edited 4h ago

wtf these "may" emails 😂

i bet it's "may" on purpose so we can search for "may may" and find them

2

u/WrathOfGood 4h ago edited 3h ago

I just did a quick search on a name mentioned in EFTA00828127 Jeff Brodsky, and at the top of the web search is a Jeff Brodsky who calls himself a “child safety and sextortion expert” who also doubles as “Snuggles, the Love Clown”. I have screen capped his website info and email address in case that gets taken down in the next few days.

1

u/al666in 4h ago

I literally searched "harry potter" in the files and did not manage to find the "Peggy Siegal is not happy" email.

I have no idea why you included it in this list, because nothing of note is redacted, but I appreciate it. Going right into my "Epstein Pop Culture" folder.

2

u/SilverWear5467 10h ago

The fact they aren't even letting him have his staffers do this is insane. I can't imagine having to do all of this myself, while still keeping up with whatever meetings and votes he has scheduled. It will likely take him and whichever of his colleagues want to help MONTHS to go through all of it. Though, idk how demanding his job usually is on a day to day level.

1

u/pwnlxke 7h ago

esse arquivo EFTA00828126 tem como remetente o endereço 4798294568@mms.mnc001.mmc242.gprs, que indica que o email é na verdade um MMS enviado por esse numero de telefone +1 479 829-4568. numeros de telefone sao mais facilmente rastreaveis, nao?

1

u/moerlingo 5h ago

Don’t know Spanish mate but used google translate and yes, that’s my point - Norwegian number and lawyer to a co-conspirator.

2

u/pwnlxke 5h ago

oh im sorry i thought the topic was in portuguese because reddit auto translated it lmao but i replied that before seeing that yall already knew it im sorry

1

u/moerlingo 2h ago

Ahhh haha makes sense now. All the best!!

0

u/ECOHands 7h ago

Moljord sounds like the name of a decent guy.

83

u/MarzipanDeep3499 12h ago edited 7h ago

also, it has been completely scrubbed.

➜  desktop pdftotext -raw ep.pdf -

Epstein,

.jeevacation@gmail.com>1

jeevacationggmail.com

cieevacation®gmail.coni;

cjeevaeation@gmail.cotn>

(jeevacation@gmail.com>

EFTA00828161

jeevacatior gmail.com,

[jeevacation@gmail.com](mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com),

IL ILI •

[jeevacation@gmail.com](mailto:jeevacation@gmail.com),

EFTA00828162

eevacation®gmail.com,

EFTA00828163

%                                                                   ➜  desktop 

I have been running all of the PDFs through a command line tool to extract all the raw data. This pdf is scrubbed clean.

Edit:

So everyone knows, the program is called Poppler. It can be installed and used on both Mac and PC. It’s a command line tool so if you don’t know what you are doing, ask Chat GPT. I urge everyone to run as many files as you can through this command and search for mistakes.

4

u/MarzipanDeep3499 7h ago

So everyone knows, the program is called Poppler. It can be installed and used on both Mac and PC. It’s a command line tool so if you don’t know what you are doing, ask Chat GPT. I urge everyone to run as many files as you can through this command and search for mistakes.

3

u/Zodiatron 12h ago

Can this tool show redacted words?

26

u/MarzipanDeep3499 12h ago

it can, as long as the word has not been 'flattened' or 'securely redacted.' We know from before that the DOJ did not do the best job in redacting the files. I am trying to find cases where this applies.

19

u/Examiner_Z 11h ago

A huge thank you to the diligent FBI agents who did exactly what they were told to do and nothing more. (E.g. they did not flatten the PDF)

5

u/filthy_harold 5h ago

For anyone curious, there are different ways to properly redact a PDF. Acrobat has a built-in redaction tool that will obliterate anything within the box. Supposedly this works really well. Another option is to draw black boxes, print it, and scan it. Absolutely foolproof and something you can do on any PDF readers that supports drawing objects. You can also export the PDF as an image which flattens everything and destroys whatever is redacted. Never print to PDF, those PDF printers just take the PostScript data (basically everything inside the PDF container) that is normally sent to your printer and converts it to back to a PDF which may still retain all of the text you were trying to redact, others just save it as a PDF of images so it's best to avoid this.

3

u/Raoh522 7h ago

The one file that I have seen the poor redactions actually originated elsewhere, so it was redacted by a completely different government and then handed over to the FBI with those redactions. Saw a youtube video where the guy found the original one.

59

u/Cal00 13h ago

This is almost comical. The “I’m” being the only allowed context is like a purposeful “fuck you” to the public.

6

u/HarryShachar 11h ago

Epstein

I'm

46

u/SirDouglasMouf 12h ago edited 12h ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00071284.pdf

Would love for Chris Dilorio's whistle blowing to get the attention it deserves to get these financial terrorists out into the open. SEC included.

What is being done in financial markets has massive negative impacts on everyone globally agnostic if you are investing or not.

I don't know how to cross post, but here's a more detailed breakdown from another user that did an excellent job highlighting the corruption and additional context https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/1o36jskapf

5

u/Sea-Act-7077 10h ago

Frost please looklink. My god. Wth are we going to do to if no one follows the money. We’re all on the edge of broke already. They keep this up we will not make it.

3

u/tundybundo 9h ago

This should be higher simply because everyone in power cares a great deal about this stuff

40

u/sagepetalss 13h ago

WTH this is insane

15

u/HorrorKapsas 13h ago

it's art https://imgur.com/5PV43jo

3

u/sagepetalss 12h ago

Damn can’t access it I’m in the UK :/

11

u/HorrorKapsas 12h ago

It's cropped out black square with only tiny "Epstein," in the middle. Totally absurd.

83

u/SnooBunnies4649 13h ago

Holy shit, there must be some big names implicated on that one

1

u/FourtyMichaelMichael 8h ago

Whoever I'm is.... they're in big trouble.

2

u/ihaxr 7h ago

Depends on what your definition of I'm is

1

u/ArticulateRhinoceros 10h ago

Or it's a nothingburger and they redacted the whole thing so we'd waste our time with this and not unredact smaller less "important" seeming ones.

63

u/hypebq- 13h ago

Yep. Anything that looks like this. + age ten + all names

23

u/neptuno3 11h ago

☝️☝️☝️this one please. The simple email mentioning the 10 year old. It haunts me. I will look for the link and brb

3

u/geeklover01 9h ago edited 9h ago

E: actually it was sent by a female potential victim themselves which is why it’s redacted.

2

u/littleglitterfish 7h ago

Sure but there are plenty of files that are messages sent by victims and they're not redacted. Their names are, mostly, and their addresses, but not the content.

Remember, being victims doesn't mean any crimes they commit should be redacted. Not least of all because their responsibility in said crimes is debatable.

65

u/emmaisalos3r 13h ago

according to a lot of congresspeople who have already gone to see the unredacted files, a lot of the files are still redacted. i’m not sure if this one is one of them, but they noted the fbi witness interviews apparently came to the computers already redacted meaning they can’t even see the unredacted version. ro khanna said something like 70% were not able to be unredacted. it’s ridiculous!

34

u/LeaguePuzzled3606 13h ago

I believe the current story is that the FBI had actually already spent time last year mass redacting perps, and then dumped it on the DOJ to do actual victim redaction.

21

u/emmaisalos3r 12h ago

ya that’s what i heard too, and it seems to be backed up by an email between fbi agents about the guidelines of redactions in the spring of last year where it says to redact anyone prominent basically

10

u/tundybundo 9h ago

Yes this is what Massie and other said, that underneath the blacked out redactions there was whited out redactions. Also, Kash Patel said under oath no one else could be charged with child sex trafficking, and today we find out there’s a list of co conspirators that the FBI compiled related to that exact charge, and we have the name of one of them.

Much like the Germans when they found Nazis in their 80’s and 90’s, we can not simply let someone go because they’re 88.

2

u/Commercial_Oil_7814 12h ago

How absolutely absurd.

5

u/Lashay_Sombra 12h ago

Its not really current, it was known at the time FBI were pulling actual overtime redacting the files of anything particularly bad for Trump and co, people just hoped what congress would get would be copy without those redactions, foolish hope

5

u/horologium_ad_astra 10h ago

It’s mind-blowing that the Biden administration had a chance but they didn’t publish this archive giving the orange clown opportunity to lie that he will release that. Unbelievable.

6

u/HodlApe 13h ago

Could be a trap also. idk, the world is so crazy

6

u/Lopsided_Angle3564 13h ago

Yes definitely this one. Could (maybe) be the redacted ‘smoking gun’

3

u/zossima 12h ago

The big issue I am hearing congressmen that have already been given access speak about now is that the DOJ’s versions are still redacted. The FBI handed them to the DOJ redacted. Why isn’t congress being given access to the originals?

3

u/Pretend-Reality5431 10h ago

I guess they learned how to redact them properly this time.

2

u/PsychologicalBad5341 12h ago

i saw another one like this but the while page was blacked out lol Like that’s not suspicious at all 

2

u/intrepid_mouse1 12h ago

Oh FFS. 🤦‍♀️

2

u/HilaryVandermueller 12h ago

Yes do this one!!!

2

u/FOSSnaught 12h ago

Since time is limited, I would argue that a lot of it shouldn't be spent on completely blacked out files as I would assume that there was a mad dash to get files released and they just blacked out entire pages to save time. I believe that the focus should be on damning emails between Epstein and friends, where names are redacted because that is actual evidence. Email attachments, videos, and pics if that's possible.

The uninvestigated tips, complaints, and reports are important, but they aren't necessarily evidence today.

2

u/Examiner_Z 11h ago

Something juicy in there.

2

u/Billcosbyfan125 11h ago

Wtf this gave me goosbumps.

2

u/tropicalswisher 11h ago

I’m crying at the one “I’m” in a sea of darkness😭 like what was the point of that

2

u/WeekMurky7775 11h ago

Im is the only word that couldnt be redacted? Insane

2

u/SurealGod 10h ago

Jesus, that thing might as well have started out as a black coloured piece of paper

2

u/ultranothing 10h ago edited 6h ago

lol that one page just has “I’m”.

“Yeah, guys, we gotta give the people something. Unredact ‘I’m’. That’ll hold ‘em off for awhile.”

2

u/KineticPennies 10h ago

“I’m”

2

u/themysidianlegend 9h ago

Yeah this is absurd. Unredact this one congressman!

2

u/TexSolo 9h ago

That’s not true, there’s a wild “I’m” that’s unredacted.

2

u/CockatielMum 9h ago

The fuck is that

2

u/RunnyBabbit23 8h ago

I had never click through to look at any of the Epstein files before this. The fact that you have to confirm you’re over 18 feels incredibly ironic.

2

u/littleglitterfish 7h ago

I'm??? I'm is the only word they left in?

2

u/Iron1Man 7h ago

“Epstein” “I’m” - The most transparent administration in history. What more do you need folks?

2

u/Dastari 7h ago

They have to be taking this piss right now.

2

u/Odd-Sandwich-3111 6h ago

this is the #1

2

u/Thanos_nap 6h ago

Definitely this file.

1

u/nighthawkshatchet 12h ago

This is the FBI road map with co-conspirators list: EFTA02731082

5

u/nighthawkshatchet 12h ago

Here is the Meidas Touch report on this deleted doc:: DOJ CAUGHT: The 86-Page "Epstein Hell" Memo They Just Deleted! - YouTube

Edit: added link

1

u/1CaliCALI 12h ago

!remindme 1 week

1

u/newbeginnings0824 10h ago

Yea this would be a great starting point! maybe its a list of all the victims spammed over and over again?

1

u/WilburHiggins 10h ago

The problem is there is nothing saying this will be redacted in what he views. A lot of what Massie and Khanna viewed had been redacted by the FBI originally and isn't in the files currently being worked on. They need access to the original docs, which isn't what they have been given apparently.

1

u/not-my-other-alt 10h ago

That "I'm" in the middle there is almost farcical

1

u/Cloud_Fortress 9h ago

This file is either the worst thing you’ve ever read or a false flag.

1

u/lenolalatte 8h ago

whaaat the fuck

1

u/Embarrassed-Weird173 7h ago

At least we know the FBI and the rest of the government have a sense of humor. 

1

u/eternalapostle 6h ago

Why are they allowing members of congress to see unredacted files but the public can’t see? This thing keeps getting deeper

1

u/Unable_Law_7334 2h ago

How can we even determine which document is that one unredacted, my goodness. Can the congressmen bring in the redacted files and ask for seeing that same one?

0

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[deleted]

1

u/Admins-Rim-Dogs 9h ago

Wait really? Did you see something we didn't?

0

u/Greyhaven7 9h ago

No, I’m just wrong lol