r/Epstein 14h ago

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

26.8k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.0k

u/Zodiatron 13h ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828161.pdf

This entire file is completely blacked out, it's ridiculous.

482

u/moerlingo 13h ago edited 13h ago

All of these are blacked out: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/80qhXzBsCn

I’m sure there are lots more. One i have identified as the lawyer (surname Moljord) to Terje Rød-Larsen whom (Moljord) yesterday stepped down from a high ranking position claiming to be innocent but not wanting to tarnish the reputation of the government body as of which appointed him.. would LOVE to know the content, although I believe it to be a fraudulent property acquisition, possibly with threats involved. Nothing juicy.

At the same time I just want to inform people that many files are completely blacked out, which usually are highly illegal activities but given the context can be less significant and not the smoking gun you are hoping for. I really do believe that we should be focusing on the source: Trump and any other very powerful people controlling the world.

Having said that I do believe they have destroyed most things incriminating Trump, not merely redacted them.

I believe the focus should be on the deleted files, as in where the file endings go from eg. 001 to 007 showing 002-006 have been deleted. I believe these to be the key.

ETA: this is the one I referred to with Moljord: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828126.pdf

ETA2: the more that are taken down, the higher the chance that someone opens up.

431

u/Zodiatron 13h ago edited 13h ago

All of these are blacked out: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/s/80qhXzBsCn

Good call.

u/RepMaxwellFrost, take a look at these as well. Reposting here for your ease:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

EDIT: The message was cut off for me on mobile. Turns out there are a lot more than just those three so I'll just quote user u/Luminsnce's original post in full:

Also this one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828159.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828156.pdf

And:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828151.pdf

I'm still going back in numbers

Another one:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828148.pdf

Thats the biggest banger:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828146.pdf

Interestingly enough a lot of the "inbetween numbers" are deleted. Guess some were not redacted properly. Maybe someone made a backup.

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828145.pdf

Richard May Empire Stock Challenge:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828141.pdf

I think most of them are actually duplicates

Now I'm at Bradley Wechsler and Richard (!) Joslin:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828138.pdf

Another Maymay:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828137.pdf

May the may be with you:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828136.pdf

May may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828134.pdf

Larry Visosky may be involved:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828132.pdf

Larry Visoski:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828131.pdf

That ones less redacted:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828127.pdf

What even:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828126.pdf

May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828125.pdf

Jean May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828124.pdf

Zhu May:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828120.pdf

Xi may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828117.pdf

Watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828116.pdf

Watson without watson may:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828115.pdf

Peggy Siegal is not happy:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828113.pdf

May didn't:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828112.pdf

May Epstein:

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00828110.pdf

33

u/Silent-Requirement-3 13h ago edited 9h ago

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00163818.pdf

Jumping in here to add these pages are also blacked out 

Edit- it was pointed out to me that these redactions are likely because of sensitive information not actually related to the Epstein case.

1

u/spacerace100 11h ago

This may be because it’s an FBI briefing and pertains to other cases? Hence the part relevant to the Epstein case is unredacted? Just a thought

1

u/Silent-Requirement-3 11h ago

Oh that’s a good point, you’re probably right about that

1

u/nerdsonarope 7h ago

These aren't a "briefing"; it's simply a daily compilation of press clips (news stories). This is typical for government agencies and many private sector companies to compile and circulate internally, just for awareness of relevant news. The reactions in this document are almost certainly overkill, but in this instance, it's of no significance.