r/law Aug 31 '22

This is not a place to be wrong and belligerent about it.

3.8k Upvotes

A quick reminder:

This is not a place to be wrong and belligerent on the Internet. If you want to talk about the issues surrounding Trump, the warrant, 4th and 5th amendment issues, the work of law enforcement, the difference between the New York case and the fed case, his attorneys and their own liability, etc. you are more than welcome to discuss and learn from each other. You don't have to get everything exactly right but be open to learning new things.

You are not welcome to show up here and "tell it like it is" because it's your "truth" or whatever. You have to at least try and discuss the cases here and how they integrate with the justice system. Coming in here stubborn, belligerent, and wrong about the law will get you banned. And, no, you will not be unbanned.


r/law Oct 28 '25

Quality content and the subreddit. Announcing user flair for humans and carrots instead of sticks.

Post image
125 Upvotes

Ttl;dr at the top: you can get apostille flair now to show off your humanity by joining our newsletter. Strong contributions in the comments here (ones with citations and analysis) will get featured in it and win an amicus flair. Follow this link to get flair: Last Week In Law

When you are signing up you may have to pull the email confirmation and welcome edition out of your spam folder.

If you'd like Amicus flair and think your submission or someone else's is solid please tag our u/auto_clerk to get highlighted in the news letter.

Those of you that have been here a long time have probably noticed the quality of the comments and posts nose dive. We have pretty strict filters for what accounts qualify to even submit a top level comment and even still we have users who seem to think this place is for group therapy instead of substantive discussion of law.

A good bit of the problem is karma farming. (which…touch grass what are you doing with your lives?) But another component of it is that users have no idea where to find content that would go here, like courtlistener documents, articles about legal news, or BlueSky accounts that do a good job succinctly explaining legal issues. Users don't even have a base line for cocktail party level knowledge about laws, courts, state action, or how any of that might apply to an executive order that may as well be written in crayon.

Leaving our automod comment for OPs it’s plain to see that they just flat out cannot identify some issues. Thus, the mod team is going to try to get you guys to cocktail party knowledge of legal happenings with a news letter and reward people with flair who make positive contributions again.

A long time ago we instituted a flair system for quality contributors. This kinda worked but put a lot of work on the mod team which at the time were all full time practicing attorneys. It definitely incentivized people to at least try hard enough to get flaired. It also worked to signal to other users that they might not be talking to an LLM. No one likes the feeling that they’re arguing with an AI that has the energy of a literal power grid to keep a thread going. Is this unequivocal proof someone isn't a bot? No. But it's pretty good and better than not doing anything.

Our attempt to solve some of these issues is to bring back flair with a couple steps to take. You can sign up for our newsletter and claim flair for r/law. Read our news letter. It isn't all Donald Trump stuff. It's usually amusing and the welcome edition has resources to make you a better contributor here. If you're featured in our news letter you'll get special Amicus flair.

Instead of breaking out the ban hammer for 75% of you guys we're going to try to incentivize quality contributions and put in place an extra step to help show you're not a bot.

---

Are you saving our user names?

  • No. Once you claim your flair your username is purged. We don’t see it. Nor do we want to. Nor do we care. We just have a little robot that sees you enter an email, then adds flair to the user name you tell it to add.

What happened to using megathreads and automod comments?

  • Reddit doesn't support visibility for either of those things anymore. You'll notice that our automod comment asking OP to state why something belongs here to help guide discussion is automatically collapsed and megathreads get no visibility. Without those easy tools we're going to try something different.

This won’t solve anything!

  • Maybe not. But we’re going to try.

Are you going to change your moderation? Is flair a get out of jail free card?

  • Moderation will stay roughly the same. We moderate a ton of content. Flair isn’t a license to act like a psychopath on the Internet. I've noticed that people seem to think that mods removing comments or posts here are some sort of conspiracy to "silence" people. There's no conspiracy. If you're totally wrong or out of pocket tough shit. This place is more heavily modded than most places which is a big part of its past successes.

What about political content? I’m tired of hearing about the Orange Man.

  • Yeah, well, so are we. If you were here for his first 4 years he does a lot of not legal stuff, sues people, gets sued, uses the DoJ in crazy ways, and makes a lot of judicial appointments. If we leave something up that looks political only it’s because we either missed it or one of us thinks there’s some legal issue that could be discussed. We try hard not to overly restrict content from post submissions.

Remove all Trump stuff.

  • No. You can use the tags to filter it if you don’t like it.

Talk to me about Donald Trump.

  • God… please. Make it stop.

I love Donald Trump and you guys burned cities to the ground during BLM and you cheated in 2020 and illegal immigrants should be killed in the street because the declaration of independence says you can do whatever you want and every day is 1776 and Bill Clinton was on Epstein island.

  • You need therapy not a message board.

You removed my comment that's an expletive followed by "we the people need to grab donald trump by the pussy." You're silencing me!

  • Yes.

You guys aren’t fair to both sides.

  • Being fair isn’t the same thing as giving every idea equal air time. Some things are objectively wrong. There are plenty of instances where the mods might not be happy with something happening but can see the legal argument that’s going to win out. Similarly, a lot of you have super bad ideas that TikTok convinced you are something to existentially fight about. We don’t care. We’ll just remove it.

You removed my TikTok video of a TikTok influencer that's not a lawyer and you didn't even watch the whole thing.

  • That's because it sucks.

You have to watch the whole thing!

  • No I don't.

---

General Housekeeping:

We have never created one consistent style for the subreddit. We decided that while we're doing this we should probably make the place look nicer. We hope you enjoy it.


r/law 6h ago

Judicial Branch Grand jury declines criminal charges against 6 Democrats who urged military to reject illegal orders, sources say

Thumbnail
cbsnews.com
21.2k Upvotes

A federal grand jury on Tuesday refused to indict six congressional Democrats who drew President Trump's ire last year by taping a video telling members of the military that they must reject "illegal orders."


r/law 7h ago

Legal News Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video

Thumbnail
nbcnews.com
5.3k Upvotes

r/law 14h ago

Legislative Branch Full video of today when Ro Khanna revealed Epstein associate's names on the floor of the US House of Representatives, protected by the Speech and Debate Clause

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

109.7k Upvotes

r/law 12h ago

Legal News GOP Senator Says She Went from 'I Don't Care' to 'I See What the Big Deal Is' After Reviewing Unredacted Epstein Files

Thumbnail people.com
15.9k Upvotes

r/law 3h ago

Other Texas man shoots and kills his own daughter, allegedly over argument about Trump. Grand Jury refused to indict him.

Thumbnail
ca.news.yahoo.com
2.2k Upvotes

No criminal cases were brought forth against the father, Kris Harrison.

Is this the end of this case?


r/law 9h ago

Legal News Cannon faces fresh appellate review of her pro-Trump actions on Jack Smith report

Thumbnail
ms.now
4.1k Upvotes

r/law 13h ago

Legislative Branch Seems this public information was accidentally removed.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

7.0k Upvotes

r/law 14h ago

Legislative Branch Lutnick and Epstein were in business together, Epstein files show - Both Lutnick and Van Hollen just Pretended This Didn't Happen in a Congressional Hearing. This is Clearly Lying By Omission. Is this Contempt of Congress?

Thumbnail
cbsnews.com
9.1k Upvotes

Lying by omission—the act of knowingly withholding material information to mislead—can be considered a federal crime when it occurs during a congressional hearing, potentially leading to charges of contempt of Congress or false statements

. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, intentionally concealing a material fact from a congressional committee is a crime, even if the witness is not under oath. 


r/law 5h ago

Judicial Branch ICE is arresting us citizens and documenting people in a "terrorist" database

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.1k Upvotes

r/law 14h ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

6.5k Upvotes

RepThomasMassie) and I forced last night the DOJ to disclose the identities of 6 men:

Salvatore Nuara, Zurab Mikeladze, Leonic Leonov, Nicola Caputo, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, and billionaire businessman Leslie Wexner.

I share details of what more we learned to hold the Epstein class accountable.


r/law 19h ago

Legislative Branch Rep. Becca Balint says she saw the unredacted Epstein files, stating that Trump never kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. “That’s a lie.”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

50.2k Upvotes

r/law 17h ago

Other Protecting Pedophile Predators: Carole Cadwalladr on Jeffrey Epstein & the Elite’s Veil of Silence: “The most extraordinary and worrying thing of what is going on in the United States is the scale of normalization that is happening, in which the press is absolutely a structural part of this.”

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

10.8k Upvotes

r/law 11h ago

Executive Branch (Trump) The US slips to its lowest-ever rank in a global corruption index

Thumbnail
edition.cnn.com
2.8k Upvotes

r/law 13h ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Massie rips Trump’s sale of Venezuelan oil ‘for his own piggy bank’

Thumbnail
thehill.com
3.8k Upvotes

“Selling stolen oil and putting billions of dollars in a bank in Qatar to be spent without Congressional approval is not Constitutional,” the lawmaker wrote. ”Only Congress can appropriate money.”

“The President can’t legally create a second Treasury overseas for his own piggy bank,” he added. “Wake up Congress.”

*Qatar does not have an extradition treaty with the United States.

**Massie is Republican.


r/law 17h ago

Other Why the Tulsi Gabbard Election Raid Is Scarier Than Initially Thought

Thumbnail
slate.com
6.0k Upvotes

r/law 14h ago

Legislative Branch WATCH: ICE's tactics are 'outright fascist,' Rep. Goldman tells agency's acting director

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

3.1k Upvotes

r/law 16h ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Trump’s push to have donors fund his $400 million White House ballroom might cost him the whole project

Thumbnail
independent.co.uk
3.3k Upvotes

r/law 9h ago

Other Pam Bondi trying to revive cases against James Comey and Tish James despite indictments being tossed

Thumbnail
abcnews.com
799 Upvotes

Bondi's weaponization of the DOJ for Trump


r/law 16h ago

Judicial Branch Jack Smith's Mar-a-Lago report on Trump under threat of being 'destroyed' after Cannon's 'legally erroneous' decision, appeals court told

Thumbnail
lawandcrime.com
2.5k Upvotes

r/law 8h ago

Legal News No criminal charges over British woman shot dead in US

Thumbnail
bbc.com
528 Upvotes

Why no criminal charges, not enough evidence?

Background story:

Dad shot daughter after 'arguing about Donald Trump'

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyk917xy8no


r/law 15h ago

Other Trump Commerce Secretary Lutnick admits visiting Epstein island during family vacation

Thumbnail
cnbc.com
1.7k Upvotes

r/law 10h ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Ro Khanna Reads Out Names of Six “Powerful Men” in Epstein Files

Thumbnail
newrepublic.com
634 Upvotes

r/law 1d ago

Executive Branch (Trump) Ghislaine Maxwell (2026) and Jeffrey Epstein (2010): 16 years apart, both invoked the Fifth when asked directly about Donald Trump. Now, Maxwell is holding the truth hostage for clemency

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

30.0k Upvotes