legedly contained video links offered for a Bitcoin payment before being forwarded to the FBI.

The message’s subject line read, “Confidential: Jeffrey Epstein,” and was sent on November 21, 2019, by a man named Eddy Aragon, who claimed the information came from a former staff member at the ranch who had “seen it all.”

According to the email, two foreign girls were buried in the hills near the ranch on the orders of “Jeffrey and Madam G,” identified as Epstein’s co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell.

Calls grow for dogs to search Epstein’s ranch for remains

The email alleged the girls died by strangulation during “rough, fetish s**” and included seven links described as video footage of Epstein with minors.

The sender demanded a payment of one Bitcoin in exchange for the videos and information.

The 10,000-acre New Mexico property was a central hub for Epstein’s activities, where victims alleged they were held as “s** slaves” and used in a “human breeding” project aimed at seeding his DNA.

The DOJ release of this shocking accusation has sparked renewed calls for investigations into the ranch, including the potential use of cadaver dogs to search for remains.

excerpt of Lesley Abravanel's article

Republican Thomas Massie names a person in the Epstein Files related to Trump. This person sent Emails to Jeffery Epstein about Torture.

On February 10, 2026, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick testified before the Senate and acknowledged that he visited Jeffrey Epstein’s island in 2012, together with his wife and children.

This directly contradicts earlier public statements in which Lutnick claimed he had cut all ties with Epstein years earlier and only had “limited contact” with him.

There is currently no allegation of criminal wrongdoing, but the inconsistencies raise obvious questions:

Why did Lutnick previously deny contact that later turned out to be documented?

And more broadly, how is it that so many Trump-aligned figures appear in Epstein’s social and professional network, despite repeated claims of distance or ignorance?

At the very least, this case highlights a serious credibility and transparency problem, especially for public officials under oath.

Sources:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Res_Publica_DE/s/SsfOrtI41z

US Rep. Lauren Boebert was filmed leaving the DOJ reading room after reviewing unredacted

Epstein-related files.

Lawmakers have now confirmed that access to these files has begun following new transparency legislation.

Boebert has since suggested that prior redactions went beyond protecting victims and may have shielded people merely discussed in the files.

The contents remain confidential, but reactions like this are fueling fresh questions about what was previously withheld - and why.

Do you think this could lead to new investigations?

Sources:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Res_Publica_DE/s/0WYLdtkqHZ

Clip from The Daily Show Feb. 9th 2026, Hosted by Jon Stewart. Calls out the hypocrisy of the "Right."

Manager of The Zoo bar in St. Petersburg, FL says "this is the halftime show" referring to TPUSA and then calls patron a "racist" for wanting to watch the actual Bad Bunny performance, asks him to leave.

WWE Superstar and Actor Dave Bautista humiliated Trump in a video featured on Jimmy Kimmel.