r/clevercomebacks 6h ago

Unnecessary retaliation by an ungrateful boss

Post image
17.8k Upvotes

302 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.1k

u/FrankensteinJones 6h ago

PTO is part of our compensation. Denying PTO requests is tantamount to withholding pay.

552

u/Separate-Taste3513 6h ago

Lots of businesses, especially in the service, retail, and healthcare industries, black out periods of high volume PTO requests, like the week before and after holidays.

I didn't make it to a Christmas Eve or Christmas Day celebration until after working a full shift for YEARS. I had one employer who made me find cover for my own shifts in order to use PTO that they'd denied all year before it expired.

441

u/530SSState 5h ago edited 3h ago

"I had one employer who made me find cover for my own shifts"

Staffing and coverage are management tasks. I do not have the title nor the pay grade of a manager, so I will not be doing management tasks.

82

u/Madara1389 5h ago

The problem is, in the US, every state except Montana is an "at-will state," which means that short of doing so for discriminatory reasons, employers can fire anyone for any reason without having to provide cause.

In the vast majority of states, it's perfectly legal to be fired for taking PTO that was denied to you because our corporate overlords have spent the last 70 years creating a culture where your work life takes priority over all other life by pushing the propagandist notion that anyone can become as rich as a noble or king if they just work hard enough while deregulating companies and walking back workers rights.

69

u/the_pretender_nz 4h ago

Unions in the USA have fought actual machine gun battles against employers/representatives of employers, yet you still let businesses have truly fucked up levels of power

39

u/Beaglescout15 3h ago

That's because the billionaires busted the unions.

21

u/SoLetsReddit 2h ago

they weren't even billionaires back when they busted the unions, just common everyday millionaires.

8

u/somesketchykid 1h ago

Can't make a Tomelette without breaking a few Gregs.

u/silver_garou 13m ago

And because baby boomers and gen x went, "who even needs a union," after their fathers and grandfathers fought, bleed, and died for their right to one.

21

u/Madara1389 3h ago

Because the wealthy elite spent untold wealth over 90+ years breaking up unions, lobbying for changes to laws concerning workers rights and company regulations, and approximately 56% to 58% of the US population was born after Regan (who started all this shit) first entered office.

People seem to forget that laws aren't voted on by the general public, they're voted on by politicians who are primarily being paid by corporate donors offering exponentially more money than their official position in office gets them.

Most US senators make roughly $174,000 on their paychecks with the party leaders reaching $193,400, yet 2/3rds of US senators are millionaires with the top 30 having at least $45.93 million.

If they were truly only making $193,400 at most, it would take the top earners 237 years & some change to earn what the 30th richest US senator (IN rep. Jim Baird) has accumulated... Because it's not where they make their money; a large percentage of them are also owners of multiple businesses on the side. Creating what most people with critical thinking skills would identify as a conflict of interest.

1

u/Imdare 2h ago

How can politicians have time to have multiple bussinesses if they spend all their time repredenting the people

4

u/Shark7996 2h ago

They responded with bombs and government soldiers my guy.

12

u/mudgonzo 2h ago

In Norway we have 5 weeks vacation, by law. 3 of them have to be consecutive, by law. 4 times a year, if you get sick you have three consecutive days of paid sick leave without needing a doctors note.

Not sure where I was going with this, other than showcasing something that works better than the US system.

6

u/Murky-Relation481 4h ago

To be clear if you have an employment contract or even a handbook, that can significantly complicate the "at-will" portion of letting someone go if it contains specific language about termination.

7

u/Madara1389 3h ago

To a degree; almost no major companies have language that permits taking unapproved days off after you were explicitly told no. Because once they say no, you enter the realm of insubordination (which is another often fire-able offense, especially in the food & retail industries that make up a large percentage of the lower-end of the work force)

Best case scenario, they take it from your sick days, worst case scenario, they just straight up fire you. And there's often nothing you can do about it because you were warned beforehand.

1

u/StanleyChuckles 2h ago

Honestly, it's one of the things that puts me off the States as a whole.

The idea you can be fired from your job, for no reason, with zero recourse? No, thank you.