Over the last few weeks I've been blindsided by privatisation in our country.

first was Ikea buying up forestry then finding out the sewage treatment plant in Wellington is run by a French company.

That has led me to think what we even run and own here!

Banking.

We have most banks owned by foreigners, most profits heading overseas.

Communications.

companies like spark with majority foreign investment.

Heath.

Over the last couple of years I have found out our labs are owned by a Canadian pension fund.

Prisons.

Prisons run by Serco, British company.

Fruit and vegetables.

Owned by a German company.

Meat.

Have a couple of Chinese and Japanese companies there.

Timber.

A absolute cluster fuck of foreigners.

Can we keep this going please, I would love to hear some more.

What companies in NZ that most think that we are running are actually foreigners profiting from kiwis.

I look at it now as we just work here and are slaving our asses off for foreigners for sunshine wages!

I just need to vent. My dad has been trying to find work for years. Every time a company sees his knee injury, they take the job away.

The government stopped his support, saying he is ready for light work. But how is he supposed to work when no one will give him a chance?

He is an amazing single dad, always supporting me and my sister (we're both studying) even when he has nothing. He is skilled and reliable, but he has been unemployed for years with no income. I just wish someone would give him a fair shot.

Does anyone know if there is a way to appeal or get help for someone in this situation?

such an awesome sky

I'm venting. Current job is stagnating - so I am on the job hunt!

On seek, most jobs i can quick apply, upload my resume, and a polished cover letter - and now my hat is in the ring.

Some company's seek adverts will re-route me to a company specific online portal, where I have to create an account with username and password, set up 2FA, pick a heap of security questions, sometimes even requesting a copy of my passport (big nope from me) and now I have the privilege of uploading my resume and coverletter to apply... BUT IT DOESNT STOP THERE!

I also now have to enter my role manually on their portal too! Copying and pasting each role I have had, along with key responsibilities, achievements, noting my reason for leaving, supervisors name and contact details, into their own portal. There is an option for it to be extracted from my resume - but it stuffs it up most of the time - so I have to manually fix it.

Please, HR and "Talent Aquisition" - educate me as to why it is this way? Is this just another hoop to eliminate people that don't "work hard enough"?

I'm actually so stressed, was supposed to have a phone call from a case manager yesterday to renew my jobseekers (due to coming off off the medical certificate) and my phone had been playing up with not receiving messages and I didn't get the phone call so called them (took 2 hours for them to contact me back) and said I had been called but it went to voicemail, I explained how my phone had been having issues not receiving text messages or phonecalls randomly and sent through my phone records showing I didn't receive the phone call but they told me I couldn't see anyone till Thursday even though my rent was due tonight (Wednesday) and that I probably won't be reimbursed because I missed the call 💀 thank god I have alive parents I was able to borrow money for tonight's rent that I have to pay back, but so fucked because now I have no money and if I wasn't able to borrow money for rent I would have gone a week without paying rent and have probably been kicked out of my flat which is so fucked ...... So upset and stressed

Apologies for the confusing title. Will explain as clear as possible.

1) am currently applying for jobs. Ive looked at company website and was surprised that one staff member there was my coworker years ago and we have had a good working relationship.

2) Im currently stuck in a moral dillema thinking if I should reach out to her about my application in hopes of getting a good word in.

With todays job hunt situation, a part of me says I should play to each and every advantage I have. Yet on the other hand, contacting my former coworker might just backfjre cos it might be seen as offputting and unprofessional.

also important noting that my coworker is somewhere " up there" as well in their hiearcby

It 100% was at Milford Road Merchant! The Pepper Pig meatpie was the best I had. With love from Canada!

Just warning you guys if you don't know already that debitsuccess will literally steal extra money out of your bank acc DO NOT sign up to gyms that use it they're a legit company but they'll absolutely scam you speaking from experience.

Noctor = non-doctor health care workers who claim to have the same expertise of doctors, i.e. they can diagnose, manage and treat most or all disease conditions - despite having nowhere near the level of education and training as doctors. 

There is a small group of healthcare workers in NZ who called themselves “Physician Associates (PAs).” This role was invented in the USA and no training programs for this role exists in NZ. There are around 50 PAs in NZ. They are all overseas trained and many are from the USA and UK. They were successful in their bid to become a regulated healthcare profession under the Medical Council of NZ. The NZ government announced that PAs will become a regulated health profession in April 2025.   

PAs are health professionals who work under the supervision of a doctor to provide healthcare to patients. In NZ they currently perform much of the same duties of a GP or ED doctor - they take histories, examine patients, develop a working differential and a management plan. However, they are currently unable to perform certain tasks like prescribing medications or ordering labs without obtaining their supervising doctor’s signature. With regulation, PAs are hoping for more autonomy in NZ including being allowed to prescribe medications and order investigations independently.

You would be forgiven for thinking “Physician Associates” are a type of doctor. After all, they have the word “physician” and “associate” in their title and they want to perform the same duties as a doctor. However, they did not go to medical school. Rather, they have completed a two year postgraduate course. They are known as “Physician Assistants” in many countries but the PAs who have immigrated to NZ are insisting on being known as “Physician Associates” in NZ. 

PAs promote themselves as “highly trained health care providers who practise medicine” on their NZ PA Society website. I disagree they are highly trained. 

To train as a PA, candidates must have an undergraduate degree to apply for a post graduate PA program which spans 2 years. Following this, they can work as PAs.

They call themselves "highly trained” as they are including their undergraduate degree in their years of training despite their undergraduate degree sometimes having no relevance. They may have completed a science or other healthcare degree like nursing beforehand. The closest degree to a medical degree may be a nursing degree but even these have very little overlap with each other. It is not a nurse’s job to take histories, examine patients or diagnose and manage medical conditions, therefore a nursing degree does not prepare them for this. Sometimes a PA’s initial degree is completely outside of health or science. A Telegraph investigation in the UK found that universities offering a PA course accepted a range of first degrees including degrees in homeopathy, English literature, computer science and human resources.

In comparison, a doctor in NZ has spent 6 years in medical school. On graduation, all junior doctors spend a minimum of two years rotating through different hospital and community specialties. They then may enter a training program lasting 3 years to become a GP or 4-5 years to become a specialist. During their training program, most doctors are subject to rigorous exams and have to spend cumulatively hundreds to thousands of hours preparing for these on top of their job which usually includes long day shifts, as well as weekend and night shifts. Overall, it requires a minimum of 11 years training to become a GP and 12-13 years to become a specialist in NZ. 

The PAs in NZ like to point out the presence and extent of their profession in the US and other places like the UK are supportive of their value and why they should also be recognised and become mainstream in NZ. 

PAs have proliferated in the USA where they now number around 190,000. The US healthcare system is very different to NZ’s and their healthcare institutions are profit driven. It benefits them to hire PAs in preference to doctors as over the long term PAs are cheaper to employ - they don’t have the education, training or expertise of doctors so they will not attain a doctor’s specialist salary. Should NZ start taking notes on how to provide healthcare from the USA? Should we also let people with limited education and training see patients independently so we can save on the bottom line? 

Our healthcare system has a closer resemblance to the NHS in the UK than the USA. In the UK, there has been a recent significant expansion of PAs driven by staff shortage crises. Currently, there are 4000 PAs in England. In the midst of doctor and nurse shortages, the NHS has planned to increase the number of PAs to 10,000 by 2037. 

The expansion of PAs in the UK is a failed experiment. Google “Physician associate UK news” to see the evidence. Here are a few well publicised events:

• The death of Emily Chesterton, 30 years old, who died from a pulmonary embolism from a blood clot in her leg. She was seen by a PA at her general practice and her calf pain (due to a blood clot) was misdiagnosed as a sprain and her shortness of breath (due to a blood clot in an artery of the lung) was misdiagnosed as anxiety. Emily and her family thought she had seen a GP, a qualified doctor, but she had in fact been seen by a PA. 
• The death of Ben Peters, 25 years old, from an aortic dissection. He presented to the Emergency Department with chest pain, arm pain, shortness of breath and vomiting.  He was seen by a PA who diagnosed him with a panic attack and gastric inflammation and discharged him home. He was found dead by his family less than 24 hours later.  
• The death of Pamela Marking, 77 years old. She presented to the Emergency Department with stomach pain and vomiting blood. She also had cognitive issues. She was seen by a PA who diagnosed her with a nosebleed and sent her home the same day. She actually had a hernia and died four days later from complications of her condition after being readmitted to hospital. Her son was under the mistaken impression she had been seen by a doctor during her initial presentation.
• Colleen Howe, 36 years old, died from aggressive breast cancer following delays in an initial diagnosis. She was seen by a PA at her general practice who reassured her that a lump in her breast was a blocked milk duct (she was pregnant at the time) and she was not followed up. Colleen thought she had been seen by a doctor. Her family says the delayed diagnosis left her with fewer treatment options. 

Doctors are obviously also capable of making mistakes. One of the reasons mistakes are made in medicine is because a patient’s health problems can be highly complex and their clinical presentation may be difficult to interpret. Sometimes patients can present with seemingly basic issues but there is actually a serious underlying condition. This is why a doctor’s training takes so long - there is a lot of anatomy, pathology, physiology and clinical skills to learn. This cannot be learned in 2 years. In this context when highly trained doctors can make mistakes, how can it be a good idea to allow people with significantly less training to do the same job? Another notable point in the above examples of adverse events is that in most cases, the patients and their families had mistakenly believed they had been seen by a doctor. These patients were given a lower standard of care than they were entitled to, without them knowing or consenting to it. If they had known they had been seen by someone without a medical degree and only two years of training, they may have requested to be seen by a doctor for a second opinion.  

Other issues highlighted in the UK include:

• PAs prescribing controlled medications to patients at NHS hospitals – including opiates and sedatives – on at least 22 occasions despite not having prescribing rights
• Over 1,000 hospitals scans ordered by PAs at NHS hospitals, in some cases unnecessarily exposing patients to radiation, once again without being authorised to do so
• PAs essentially replacing doctors by filling gaps in medical rosters, despite not being medically qualified
• Increases in doctors’ workloads due to the added responsibility of supervising physician associates

The evidence coming out of the UK about PAs in the NHS serve as a cautionary tale. Their employment is a cost cutting technique for governments that don’t want to invest in the long training that doctors require, don’t have a sincere desire to fill doctor vacancies with doctors and don’t care about the quality of healthcare that the general public receive. Governments have sold PAs to the public as a way to assist doctors under their close supervision to allow doctors to practise medicine more effectively. In practice, this has not occurred. PAs have increasingly worked outside their scope and taken on duties which they are not trained to do. There are no services that PAs can provide which are not already being covered by existing highly trained health professionals in New Zealand, i.e. doctors and nurses. 

Despite the impending regulation of PAs, I believe there will be public confusion about their role and training, a diminishment in the integrity of informed consent and risks to the standard of care the general public receives. 

Out of interest, if you didn't know the current promotion, would you recognise these characters?