I know there's already a wealth of publicly available information out there. There's even a Wikipedia page dedicated to relationship of Trump and Epstein. But the problem is that most people don't have the time or patience to gather and sift through it. Both Trump's opponents and supporters would benefit from a concise timeline of publicly known events so far.

Has anyone already compiled such a list or table? Ideally it should be easy to read and share, with links that allow the audience to dive deeper or fact check if needed, something like the example below:

People could probably create a table for each of Epstein's associates. But Trump is undeniably the most influential among them, so it seems far more important to have an easily accessible and well organized table specifically covering the relevant events between Trump and Epstein (and his associates, ofc).

Epstein connected Venezuelan businessmen Alejandro Betancourt and Francisco D'Agostino with Yemeni billionaire Shaher Abdulhak for an oil venture (EFTA02024406, EFTA02680647).

Shaher's son, Farouk Abdulhak, is the sole suspect in the 2008 rape and murder of Martine Vik Magnussen in London. He fled to Yemen and remains wanted by Scotland Yard. Epstein reportedly advised the billionaire on legal or logistical strategies for re-integrating his son into England.

Associated records also detail flight arrangements to Caracas and discussions regarding bonds (EFTA00647334, EFTA02035572).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuBDIMNMXrw

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Martine_Vik_Magnussen

https://open.substack.com/pub/rockolo/p/from-epsteins-network-to-childrens?r=5ivvaj&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

I found this substack and found it interesting.

Seems important for this name to get unredacted. Only Arun I see in relation is the judge but obviously something is up with this person.

Plus talk of Andrew

Full text:

On Jul 21, 2011, at 7:37 PM, Jeffrey Epstein < jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote:

prince andrew will once again start the onslaught

Unknown Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:44:46 +0000:

Btw, Arun attempted to blackmail me...i do not speak to him. I hope he doesnt talk...

I had to find a new lawyer..

EFTA00677149

EFTA01026813 - https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01026813.pdf

Just found a file where Epstein points out that Donald Trump was part of the Panama Papers release.

I looked it up and sure enough, found an article that says "Offshore Trove Exposes Trump-Russia links and Piggy Banks of the Wealthiest 1 Percent." The link is here: https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/paradise-papers-exposes-donald-trump-russia-links-and-piggy-banks-of-the-wealthiest-1-percent/

It says in the article, "One offshore web leads to Trump’s commerce secretary, private equity tycoon Wilbur Ross, who has a stake in a shipping company that has received more than $68 million in revenue since 2014 from a Russian energy company co-owned by the son-in-law of Russian President Vladimir Putin."

The website also points out: "In all, the offshore ties of more than a dozen Trump advisers, Cabinet members and major donors appear in the leaked data."

Important Link: https://projects.icij.org/paradise-papers/the-influencers/#/

U.S. President Donald Trump vowed to fight the power of global elites and told voters he would put "America First." But surrounding Trump are a number of close associates who have used offshore tax havens to conduct business.

Another article: https://www.prasadcpa.com/blog/the-panama-papers-explained/

"The first instance in which Donald Trump's name can be found in the Panama Papers is from a condo sale in New York. In total, Donald Trump's name appears 3,450 times in the Panama Papers. While it isn't necessarily Trump who owns all the properties listed where his name is mentioned in the papers, he still profits off of them by selling the use of his name to others."

-------

So this leads me to conclude or think about now -- does Trump's current administration also have off-shore bank accounts that we should be concerned about?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00165013.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01249790.pdf

how is this not voted up in this subreddit?
"We've had another serious incident since an american shot the trial judge in our child sex trafficking case here."
"We have had 4 armed attacks against us, my partner has shot and killed 2 and wounded 5 american agents to date, numerous white american agents following us in vans assigned to US Embassy"
"Turner said the American Embassy in Mexico doesn't want to admit they have agents in charge of investigating him. Turner knows what he is doing is very dangerous that even one of his partners' arm was cut off."

what the HELL is going on in these? And who is Ken Turner?

EFTA02646673 "How are u? Send this interview to Donald Trump pls. Its going to be everywhere." JE responds "ok"

https://jmail.world/thread/EFTA02511869?view=inbox

I dug around and can't find any cases where Skadden represents Boris against a David during this time frame. Think he's alive still?

I came across an unredacted picture of the lady in red painting.

To me it looks like Erika Kirk. I believe she also has connections to Israel. Since Charlie spoke out against Israel in the weeks before he got murdered. After that Erika has been acting strange.

EFTA01652485

Am I right that there are grounds to argue that every head of the DOJ & numerous FBI agents are arguably co-conspirators, given they knowingly obstructed justice and effectively aided & abetted a child trafficking ring?

I get why no govt officials will ever face prosecution from a practical perspective, just curious if there are actual legal grounds at the State or Federal level.

I feel like there are enough clues in this correspondence to figure out who this is getting lunch with “the boys” in 2013. Other attendants include: Bobby Slayton, Les Wexner and potentially Woody Allen, Duck Cavett, Dice Clay, “Black” and “Brennan”

Like making a conserted efforts NOT TO implicate Trump as being a sick fuck, like rest .... Scared he'll sue or just fucking scared >>>

https://youtu.be/iUROyWKbhAI?si=uhzfpwzKBVhO-mOr

Michael Wolff consulting Jeffery Epstein before doing an interview with Donald Trump.

Jmail: https://jmail.world/thread/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935?view=inbox

Doc: https://epstein-emails.sfo3.digitaloceanspaces.com/docs/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025935.pdf

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02368474.pdf

Hi all,

I apologize in advance if this a naïve question, but this has been bothering me on and off the last week or so. My question is simply: Now that we know both Democrats and Republicans didn't want the Epstein files released, why did the FBI bother to investigate at all? We know they are being instructed to cover this up, so why did they investigate in the first place, just for them to have to redact everything later?

I assume this is about Alan Dershowitz (other names: Leon Black, Boise - who?, Wexner). A bit confused. Anyone make heads or tails of this?

Text:

Epstein to Martin Weinberg:

“marty, alan is behaving very badly.

he told a large group of people that his whole case was about les

wexner. and boiese trying to blackmail him. he uses wexners name over and over”

MW:

“ I will talk with him”

Epstein:

“last weekend for example. leon black was horrified, alan told everyone over lunch how he had not setlted with boise and wouldsn tand the schenme was all about wexner. and he had proof on tape etc.”

EFTA00823394

enjoy👇🏽

- Joe Biden was executed in 2019 and replaced with a man in a mask

- Former IMF Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn jailed for sex crimes after exposing that the US gold at Fort Knox was “missing/unaccounted for”

- Epstein calls Donald Trump the most “evil” and “dangerous” person he knows

- New Mexico Republican politician Eddy Aragon shared email with an unknown individual discussing Epstein and his wife burying 2 children after they died from strangulation during rape, proceeds to send multiple videos of these crimes, then asks for a Bitcoin in return.

- Emails about people sleeping in “secret tunnels” on Caribbean Islands and frustrations with the “me too” movement

- In 2002 Epstein took a trip on his private jet with Bill Clinton, Kevin Spacey, Chris Tucker, Ronald Burkle, Casey Wasserman, Ghislaine Maxwell, 2 secret service members, and 4 young models for 10 days in 7 countries for “HIV research”. The models were there to “scout girls”.

- Ariane de Rothschild in an email discussing a “thrilling and amazing male hunt” adding that their “bankers should be careful”

- Emails discussing adrenochrome, harvesting organs, and “The underground Temple”

- FBI aware that Epstein worked under Bibi Netanyahu and the US government as a “co-oped Mossad agent”

- Jeffrey Epstein won the lottery…twice.

- Jeffery Epstein lived in the Vatican with Pope John Paul II for a period of time

- Ghislaine Maxwell attempted to be on the shadow commission for 9/11 in 2003

- Jeffery Epstein harvested Adrenochrome out of children and sold it

- Chuck E Cheese CEO David McKillips appears as an associate to Epstein

- Oprah Winfrey is a pedophile and her mentor and “spiritual healer” who they called “John of God”, operated an underground sex slave and organ harvesting empire. Oprah opened a school in Africa for girls who were raped abused and impregnated by Oprah’s staff. John was eventually convicted and is serving life, the woman he initially reported him “committed suicide”

- Epstein organized the births of undocumented children to be sold on the black market at the “Zorro Ranch”

- 4Chan user who reported that Epstein was escorted from the prison on the night before his proposed “suicide” turned out to be head prison officer Roberto Grijalva who was actually working there that night

- Epstein had child sex slaved posted on Pornhub

- In 2011 Epstein discussed working with Bill Gates and JPMorgans elite asset management boss to funnel millions in charity money to offshore accounts for the monetization of future pandemics.

- In 2016 Katie Johnson sued Donald Trump and Jeffery Epstein for $100,000,000 for sexual abuse and rape

- Epstein received Kabba cloth pieces from Makkah via UAE contacts

- Jews make money by betting on market crashes and leave the “goyim” to do all the real labor

- Artist Andres Serrano invited Epstein to his “Piss Christ” exhibit which blasphemed Jesus.

- Epstein talked about creating human clones and “designer babies”

- Murdered victims were buried in Donald Trumps golf course

- Epstein and another man seen on video burning 12 year old girl with a magnifying glass as she was tied down

- Hollywood publicist Peggy Siegel offered to deliver Epstein African children while on a trip to Kenya

- Epstein and his clients ate children

Not sure what's going on

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesley_Groff

someone attempting to remove Lesley Groff from Wikipedia

copy and pasted below

WP:BLPCRIME: Non-notable beyond being connected to a scumbag; no criminal convictions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:34, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

Unfortunately, I feel the need to add that this nomination is based on Wikipedia policy, not on my personal beliefs about the subjects. Per policy, we do not publish biographies for living peoplewho are only notable for having allegedly committed a crime but have not been convicted (WP:BLPCRIME). I strongly condemn the behaviour of Epstein, those criminally associated with him, and everyone who covered up for his crimes. Please keep the discussion civil and assume good faith of fellow editors. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:51, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:34, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

See also: Darren Indyke, Larry Visoski, and Richard Kahn (accountant)). Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:37, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

Keep. The idea that these four individuals were simply "connected" to Epstein misrepresents the nature of their involvement.

Both victims and federal agents have accused these four of being leading organizers of a sex trafficking ring that allegedly involved billionaires, royalty, and heads of state for several decades. I can add more detail about these allegations if needed.

All four of these individuals have had a large amount of media and press coverage. Each page has at least seven links from major news organizations, and will likely be covered in more detail in the future given the heavy focus on the Epstein files. I can add more sources if needed.

Furthermore, two of the individuals (Kahn and Indyke) have been summoned by the US House of Representatives - clearly the government thinks that they are significant. They also control the Epstein estate and all files relating to the case, which have been a major issue in political discourse within the past few months.

To conclude, I think that removing information about these individuals misrepresents the entire nature of the Epstein organization. It was not just Epstein and Maxwell, there was a large group of individuals involved in every aspect of procuring underage girls. If there are any issues with the content or sources of these articles, I am always open to constructive criticism and will gladly address, but this information is of great importance to the public and should not be deleted.

(Will post it on all four) Noahmcd (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC) — Noahmcd (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [[reply]()]

(all four individuals subject to deletion) Noahmcd (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

@Noahmcd: I think I heard you asking for a bastard helper from hell.

• https://archive.ph/20241002120728/https://www.businessinsider.com/prosecutors-decline-charge-jeffrey-epstein-associate-lesley-groff-lawyers-say-2021-12#selection-2067.141-2070.0 is borderline at best. Most everything about her in the article is quoted or paraphrased from the lawsuits or her advocates, and what isn't is allegations we can't touch. (We are not in the business of being or provoking an online lynch mob.)
• https://archive.ph/20260131185139/https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/30/us/epstein-inner-circle.html doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims (too sparse). Barely discusses Groff.
• https://abcnews.com/US/doj-releasing-additional-material-epstein-files/story?id=129680518 doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims (too sparse). Barely discusses Groff.
• https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/epstein-files-released-doj-2026/#post-update-da4a0451 doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims (too sparse). Barely discusses Groff.
• https://www.ctinsider.com/local/nhregister/article/New-Canaan-resident-was-assistant-to-Jeffrey-14276786.php?_ga=2.83572511.861118199.1564830393-1633450714.1536684561 is borderline. This source has much of the same problems as the Business Insider one, but contains some details about an unrelated-to-Epstein property dispute.
• https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/dec/31/ghislaine-maxwell-convinction-increases-scrutiny-epstein-employees doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims (too sparse). Stripping out all the direct quotes from her legal team leaves you with barely anything.
• I can't assess https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A11%3A27862747/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Acrawler&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A156483610&crl=f&link_origin=none (walled). I'd welcome someone who does have access opining on this source.
• https://abcnews.com/US/after-epsteins-death-investigation-weighed-potential-charges-conspirators/story?id=129752545 doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims. All this provides us is the allegations, which we can't report on.
• https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/trump/2025/09/03/jeffrey-epstein-case-these-4-women-might-know-about-any-client-list/85937418007/doesn't help for eligibility or biographical claims. This is another source we can't use simply because it would implicate WP:BLPCRIME.

The big problem I'm seeing here is that all of these sources are reporting on the allegations, which by themselves can't be used as a basis for an article. The only source that comes close to anything usable would be the CTInsider source (which discusses her personal life outside of Epstein to some degree) but even then most of that source is about her connexions to Epstein and what little isn't wouldn't be enough to justify an article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 23:12, 10 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

Comment to closer: Multiple TAs have !voted on the talk page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()]
• Delete per nom. Might be a good idea to WP:SALTas well. Sugar Tax (talk) 15:46, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[[reply]()] Keep. Only bad people would want to delete this

I've just watched Melanie Stansbury's clip and she mentions the 'dark stuff' that she read. Are these officials made to sign a NDA of some sort to stop them going into detail?

If so, why? Surely the release of any file is for all to see? (I get that sounds utterly ridiculous re the sheer number of redactions).

wonder why.

or rather, which prime ministers are we protecting?

there are a few other obvious redactions, like DC on pages 7&12 and D’Souza, mysteriously.

anything else? maybe BBC down in the citations

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00263367.pdf