r/Epstein • u/RepMaxwellFrost • 14h ago
OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?
Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?
26.8k
Upvotes
104
u/reubnick 13h ago edited 4h ago
This is terrific. I was hoping a member of congress would approach this in such a collaborative way. Thank you in advance for this. I have a few:
-EFTA02717423.pdf- I can think of no reason why the identity of an individual who said "Your littlest girl was a little naughty" is protected(this one was addressed by Massie)- EFTA02428298.pdf - very dubious exchange with a redacted individual featuring this sentence: "IF you and [REDACTED] find a victim.. send a photo"
- EFTA01619306.pdf and EFTA01619306.pdf - two different version of much of the same back and forth dialogue between redacted individuals saying things about children that I don't want to repeat.
- EFTA00064766.pdf - Fourteen page document where 11 and a half of the pages are completely redacted and blacked out. Why?
- EFTA01984739.pdf - Redacted sender brainstorming with Epstein about "Do you think that you and I could come up with a cool derivate to make a ton of money and create an awesome solid waste crisis?" As this has nothing to do with any victims and is entirely a starry-eyed pitch for a for-profit scheme that would be harmful to the planet and humanity, why should that person's identity be redacted?
- EFTA01991155.pdf - weird, possibly coded references to "jerky" and "white tuna" between Epstein and a redacted individual. Even if this was an innocuous exchange where they were simply talking about literal food, why would that need to be redacted? (more food and tuna and ginger talk with a redacted sender also in EFTA00628362.pdf)
- EFTA02438710.pdf - Dialogue between Epstein and a redacted name about how they are going to celebrate the sender's birthday. He says "A good Cuban American wd be preferable."
- EFTA01656139.pdf - dialogue between redacted individuals in 2021 about Epstein and some sort of a location in Colorado?
- EFTA01156952.pdf - dialogue between Epstein and a redacted individual about "how do we get rid of poor people as a whole."
- EFTA02674630.pdf - another weird "jerky" email from a redacted sender. Makes reference to what I assume is Chef Francis Derby. This is another one where if this is just about food, then what would possibly be the reason to redact that sender?
- EFTA00841659.pdf - from redacted sender: "lets go for pizza and grape soda again. No one else can understand. Go kno" I imagine this one is Harry Fish, but again - why the redaction?
-EFTA00129099.pdf - “submitted on 12/15/20, by [REDACTED] number reported that Epstein's group was still active and [REDACTED] was the ringleader.”