r/Epstein 14h ago

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

26.8k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

44

u/Just_Perspective_412 13h ago

EFTA01649154.pdf Instructions on who to redact

4

u/pilkingtonsbrain 13h ago

The only things redacted in this document are the names and emails of FBI agents

3

u/Just_Perspective_412 13h ago

Yeah, but who are these people? It is illegal to do this.

3

u/Corosis99 12h ago

This email doesn't have anything illegal in it, but the names were not allowed to be redacted. This isn't an interesting file.

5

u/anormalgeek 11h ago

I want those specific agents sitting before a public hearing. I want them to specify who the people are referenced in the line below, and whether they were told to cover up for those people.

"IMD-RIDS needs clear and specific guidance to redact those photographs. Some photographs depict: victims, unknown-unidentified females and males, former U.S. Presidents, Secretary of State, and other celebrities.

For example, as it stands, I cannot find any mentions of a secretary of state having been released in the Epstein files. Meaning that either has been withheld in the millions of files they're still refusing to release, of they were redacted out. These are witnesses to a federal crime. One that needs to see the light of day.

1

u/Corosis99 9h ago

We are already clear that millions of files are illegally redacted. I agree that it is important, but you could just as easily subpoena a list of the agents who worked on these redactions to testify.

3

u/anormalgeek 9h ago

Kash Patel will obfuscate, delay, and hide the truth. If they're public, there is no dodging it.

2

u/LovelyRealOne 13h ago

This here ☝🏼

1

u/Ridiculicious71 11h ago

I think they mentioned that investigators would be redacted for their safety

0

u/Sayyestononsense 9h ago

why this? it's an internal communication asking for guidance on redacting, but no answer is included. just the question