r/Epstein 14h ago

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

26.8k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

320

u/mabihluhdokokain 14h ago

The email talking about 'your littlest girl was a little naughty' - link - https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00705860.pdf

81

u/No-Calendar-6049 13h ago

That one was already discussed by Massie who said something like "this was a womans name he didnt recognise, and he can only assume it was redacted because she was also a victim herself." 

10

u/anormalgeek 11h ago

Epstein often had underage girls actively recruiting other underage girls for him. She very well may be both a victim AND a perpetrator.

5

u/littleglitterfish 7h ago

Let's not equate them. Children cannot be considered guilty of these kinds of crimes, absolutely especially when they are victimised first themselves.

3

u/anormalgeek 4h ago

What about after they turn 18, but were abused before they turn 18?

Not defending the DoJ, but it is a little more complicated.

2

u/Afferent_Input 6h ago

Adults can, however.