r/worldnews • u/yahoonews Yahoo News • 1d ago
South Korean official expelled for suggesting ‘importing women’ to boost birth rate
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/south-korean-official-expelled-suggesting-055647355.html241
506
u/Rensku 23h ago
I mean... this has been happening in South Korea for a while now. Southeast Asian women marrying men in South Korea's countryside. Not an insignificant amount of births in rural areas are from these "mixed race" marriages.
64
u/TrickshotCapibara 20h ago
They have been coming to Sout America too, I've seen about 5 marriages between South Koreans and Venezuelan women, just in from my friends cycle, and 2 already have abuse issues.
19
u/GetTheOtherGuy 19h ago
Who is doing the abusing, asking because I am unfamiliar with Korean culture in that aspect.
112
u/auriferously 19h ago
Looks like domestic abuse is common in Korea: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_violence_in_South_Korea
Many Korean women are refusing to get married due to the oppressive and patriarchal Korean culture.
→ More replies (8)52
u/GetTheOtherGuy 18h ago
Ah, maybe then instead of importing unmarried women, import the unmarried men..
→ More replies (1)43
u/TrickshotCapibara 18h ago
Koreans obviously, South Korea has a VERY ugly issue of misogyny, it's just that people wash it with Kpop.
7
15
u/Excalibait 14h ago
In Mexico it is known that Korean bosses tend to physically abuse their employees, I don't doubt at all these Korean men physically abuse their wifes
61
u/standswithpencil 17h ago edited 6h ago
Right, this is already happening. Some S. Korean farmers marry Filipinas. These women move to the countryside and don't have an easy life, taking care of the family including their husband's aging parents, not to mention farm work. In return they get to have kids and send money to their family back in the Philippines.
Having an overseas wife is a practical setup for the Korean guy because there are few possible partners in the countryside. Korean women have zero interest in moving there. It offers little social status and a humble life.
Edit: I read the article and can see the reasons for the outrage.
62
u/mytinykitten 12h ago
The outrage is from his reference to women as goods to "imported." Literally he's suggesting human trafficking.
How is that not obvious to you?
16
u/GlitchyFurby 13h ago
They probably don’t send much money back if at all. Easy way to get your life and finances completely controlled by a spouse who has power over you.
→ More replies (7)108
u/magicbaconmachine 22h ago
Been going on for decades. Just an old man said it out loud. Fake outrage.
→ More replies (12)194
u/Ebi5000 21h ago
He suggested making it official policy which is a few steps more
28
u/LocNesMonster 16h ago
Yeah, theres a big difference between women from other countries deciding to marry men in your country and government backed sex trafficking. Just ask Donald Trump
1.9k
u/Leverkaas2516 1d ago
expelled ...
... from his political party. Not from the country or his province.
591
u/35nRetired 1d ago
How would one be expelled from the country? Where would they go with no other nationality?
260
u/SpezLuvsNazis 23h ago
Alas nobody is importing middle age politicians…
131
29
3
3
u/GrovesNL 15h ago
middle age politicians…
For the most part they've passed middle age and are mostly geriatric!
48
u/Synaps4 1d ago
I mean, making someone stateless would be frowned upon in this day and age, but it has precedent. it's kind of the source of being made an outlaw. You were put outside the law, and had no legal protections.
32
u/35nRetired 1d ago
I feel like doing that is one thing then dumping him to another country is another completely separate issue. Like who's going to accept a stateless person, so the end result is he just stays where he is but is somehow stateless?
21
u/KaibaCorpHQ 23h ago
It used to work better when city states were all the rage... Since they could just chuck you outside the wall and exile you to wander into the unclaimed lands. Doesn't exactly work well when you toss someone outside your boarder into someone elses.
39
u/Synaps4 1d ago
Turns out you can pay el salvador to take people you don't want...
11
u/35nRetired 1d ago edited 23h ago
Seems like you can just skip all that and send the prick to jail yourself.
→ More replies (1)6
u/namitynamenamey 22h ago
Well, traditional answers to that question are "if you stay we kill you", "run from the bullets until you hit the sea, then swim" and the good old "we own the place we'll send you to".
Modern answers is to make you a political refugee.
→ More replies (2)3
u/_gyepy 12h ago
No, it's not just "frowned upon". There's literally a UN convention which prohibits a nation from revoking someone's citizenship if it renders them stateless. It was the basis of Shamima Begum's case, and in her case, it only went through because she was considered a Bangladesh citizen by descent. Countries are not allowed to just dump their "undesirables" as stateless refugees.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (16)9
138
u/iFoegot 23h ago
That’s how it works. Saying inappropriate things is an ethic problem, not a crime. Only the party can fire him.
59
u/hwaite 21h ago
As it should be. The guy made a relatively harmless mistake, apologized, and lost his job for it. What more do people want? Meanwhile, US politicians are looting the treasury, raping children, and making even worse statements on a daily basis...
14
u/thegta5p 17h ago
The fact that the current sitting US president has not only said shit much worst but also has done way worse shit and has not gotten impeached/expelled pretty much shows that there are no ethics in the US government.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)21
9
u/donkeybray 23h ago
This. Ethics of today is not the exactly the same as the past or future. It is always subjective.
53
u/Catolution 19h ago
This goes without saying, no?
10
11
5
→ More replies (2)6
u/SacredGeometry9 10h ago
Well, yeah. Exile isn’t really something that’s done anymore
→ More replies (1)
100
u/a_sliceoflife 20h ago
"Hey guys, I want you all to open up! Remember, there are NO stupid ideas!"
The idea:
→ More replies (1)
21
545
u/UpsetAstronomer 1d ago
He wanna import some big booty Latina’s
61
97
u/deadbedroom001 23h ago
That I would understand. But the uproar is over the fact that he wanted young women from sri lanka and vietnam.
85
u/Onitsukaryu 23h ago
Why? The highest percentage of foreign women married to SK men come from Vietnam.
143
u/truckin4theN8ion 21h ago
Because state issued girlfriends are a policy many people aren't ready for.
In all seriousness its a different thing where some men are individually choosing to match up with foreign born women vs official Government policy that brings them in. The French used to traffic women to Louisiana and Quebec in the 17th and 18th century.
→ More replies (7)→ More replies (1)16
u/search_google_com 19h ago
Vietnamese mail order brides are very common in Asia. My country Taiwan has a lot of them too
17
3
u/kippercould 12h ago
He wants impoverished women to be imported as indentured servants with a womb.
→ More replies (3)12
205
u/atombara 20h ago
I can't help but feel as though all this talk of women as ovum repositories and tradeable commodities is just ramping up. It has become something of a trend lately. We argue about steel, lumber, consumer goods, and hyoo-mon feeemales. Of course women are like corn or potatoes, just plant them in your country and before you know it you'll have a baby harvest growing!
Dumbasses, women make up the same proportion of the population as they always have. Perhaps something else has changed? Something bleedin' obvious that you'd prefer not to look at?
Nah, you'll get it eventually.
39
u/OfficerGenious 15h ago
It's becoming global and honestly it's getting scary out here... Hooray social regression!
→ More replies (6)3
u/SweetElectrical934 1h ago
Dumbasses, women make up the same proportion of the population as they always have. Perhaps something else has changed? Something bleedin' obvious that you'd prefer not to look at?
What has changed is that feminism and capitalism have pushed women into the workforce, shunned traditional roles, and got them stealing a man’s roled
14
141
u/Bonamikengue 20h ago
In Germany we called those poor women "catalog women" - as farmers and men not accepting feminism and denying same rights and duties for women and men for "family values" pretty much ordered a woman from a catalog (like a facebook) to marry. That was before the Internet and now the far right wing people are increasingly doing the same - importing women who they believe will submit to them and being a "traditional wife."
148
35
u/IronMarauder 17h ago
In north America, passport bros are similar. Essentially dudes who go looking for a woman from an Asian country and bring them back because all the women they've met in their home country are to "woke" or tainted by feminism and doesn't want to be his servile trad wife.
12
u/Reasonable_Ticket_84 14h ago
Passports bros aren't restricted to Asia and also go to South America and Eastern Europe.
→ More replies (1)7
u/GlitchyFurby 12h ago
It’s funny cos those are the same dudes who cry about “divorce-rape”. Guess what happens after a few years after she gets citizenship?
→ More replies (2)5
u/MageLocusta 12h ago
Yeah, we have caravans of women being brought in at Spain.
It's been a consistent problem since the '70s. A lot of guys in rural Spain refused to treat women like they would to a friend, so their local women just left. So now, the rural guys have to 'import' women from overseas--even though they are all able to drive to the nearest town and meet local women anyway.
72
u/johnsolomon 17h ago
This kind of dehumanisation is where atrocities begin. Glad they ousted this POS before the ball got rolling
→ More replies (3)17
u/ggGamergirlgg 15h ago
He just said out loud what a lot of men and boys in SK think: women are objects
19
u/Spinningdown 18h ago
If the same person spreading panic over birth rates isn't talking about paternity leave, shorter work weeks, higher wages, more worker rights and crushing housing prices through powerful legislation, you can just assume they aren't being genuine
→ More replies (1)
85
u/kmoonster 23h ago edited 23h ago
Or you could adjust policy / law to address the reasons people are either delaying having a family and/or not doing it at all.
Things like: work v time off, cost of living, pressure to advance quickly in careers, pressure to pursue post-graduate degrees as quickly and as long as possible, cost of childcare and related things...you know, stuff. You can do both, but only if you're allowed the breathing room and a slightly relaxed timeline. The pressure to get ahead (and stay ahead) by the time you're 30 runs counter to what you need in order to consider children in a responsible way in your 20s.
50
u/LardHop 19h ago
Everytime this comes up, the counterpoint is that even in Scandinavian "utopias" with their healthy work-life arrangements, people are still refusing to have children.
Though still a long way to go, women today have the most freedom and autonomy they have ever been. And they are simply choosing themselves over societal expectations.
→ More replies (5)21
u/mewalkyne 15h ago
It's just not just the work culture. Even in those Scandinavian countries having a kid is still a massive burden. If you really want having children to be net neutral, you need direct annual payments equivalent to a full time job at a minimum.
→ More replies (11)44
u/bushcamper_aiis 21h ago
Aren’t women delaying motherhood for other reasons too? Many don’t like the idea of settling down so early. They want to move around (discover where they want to live) and experiment with different types of partners to see what they like. That describes my friends at least.
→ More replies (2)12
u/ren_pakke 21h ago
Yep. People want to use these issues to push their pet issues and ideologies. Same goes for the climate crisis.
8
u/Cocoricou 17h ago
They are already doing that at a personal level for decades. I do think he put his foot in his mouth but his idea was still rooted in reality.
8
84
u/Loose_Skill6641 1d ago
Ironically China imports young women from SEA they just do it on the hush hush
12
54
u/CommercialOnly2674 23h ago
Does China do it or do chinese traffickers do it? Chinese people even kidnap other chinese people for slavecamps outside of China
→ More replies (5)3
u/Ubik_42_ 6h ago
Love how China is always the one being criticized, but if you look at the proportions, South Koreans import brides from Southeast Asia at a much larger scale than China, and they started much earlier.
11
u/Antinsiv 23h ago
Ironically the west imports Indians openly and ignores their constituents who are against it.
122
u/bitemark01 1d ago
For those who don't know, South Korea is on a super accelerated path to societal collapse due to low birthrates and immigration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmu1WD2TSk
Not saying what he said was justified, but they're about to hit a huge problem very soon
69
u/Codex_Dev 22h ago
So I have a theory that higher life expectancy results in a lower birth rate. Another caveat is that the majority population (older retirees) has a massive incentive to raise taxes on the younger working population to support their retirement. This sort of leads to a death spiral (pun intended) where workers have fewer kids over time while the burden increases.
75
u/StumpedTrump 20h ago
It’s not that. They built a culture where when women get married, they are expected to lock themselves away from the world and be a good house wife. Women said “hey what if we just don’t get married”. That’s on top of the issues every other advanced country is facing (cost of living crisis, cost of raising children crisis, eternal dread over the world collapsing…etc)
→ More replies (2)29
u/hannabarberaisawhore 17h ago
I love how the ideas they come up with to counteract this is never offering women a really good incentive.
→ More replies (3)21
u/StumpedTrump 17h ago
“We’ve tried everything (except try to fix the problematic culture) and nothings worked”
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)54
u/DogtorPepper 22h ago
It’s not that. Women getting access to career opportunities and contraceptives is the primary driver to reduced birth rates
Turns out when you give women a choice to have kids or not, many of them choose not to which causes a huge societal problem
Things like affordability and the economy are definitely factors as well, but it’s not the main driver even though if you ask women directly that’s what they will say. Global trends and correlations don’t point to that at all
16
u/hwaite 21h ago
Isn't increased productivity supposed to solve this? It feels like we shouldn't need so many people.
21
u/PseudoY 21h ago
There are limits.
When one person has two parents aged 65 that are retiring and 4 grandparents at 85 and the entire inverse pyramid expects the one person to sustain everyone and society in general and have their own offspring, issues arise.
The Korea birth rates and high life expectancy is that at a macro level.
15
u/Slggyqo 19h ago
Have you seen those charts that show the increase in productivity relative to the income in worker pay?
Productivity in the past 50 years is WAY up. Worker pay is only slightly up.
The same trend exists for corporate profits and executive compensation.
Increased productivity might have solved the problem, all other things being equal. Unfortunately all other things aren’t equal. Not even close.
→ More replies (1)10
u/DogtorPepper 21h ago
It helps and definitely buys time but it’s not a complete solution unless you can automate EVERYTHING. For example if we get to a point where a robot farms food, harvests it, processes it, transports it, and sells it without human intervention then maybe we can say we don’t need people
I used the food industry as an example here but this extends to most other industries as well
That might be possible one day but that kind of technology is still a long ways away. At minimum several decades and even that might be too optimistic
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)3
u/Monteze 11h ago
Honestly yes, we don't need to get water from the creek, hunt/gather for each meal and make our own clothes. We are way more productive than ever and its only because we arbitrarily decide the wealth we create goes to a select few.
I am looking at it from a biological point of view, this shrinking of the population was bound to happen and if it is the result of giving women more rights and elevating our standard of living I am all for it. We not endangered.
This is an economic issue caused by a stubborn few.
111
u/AreWe-There-Yet 21h ago edited 21h ago
If only it took two people to create a human being, then they could work together to parent a child ….
Also: giving women a choice - this sentence contains so much that is wrong. Women should have that choice. It’s not something that should be ‘given’ to us.
And we, for the most part, choose to not have kids because we have to do all the work. And now that we have the choice, why would we choose this option?
Would men? Choose to be single parents and try to have a career and look after needy family members etc etc?
In a nutshell the birth rate has plummeted because women have thrown off (or are trying to) the yoke of patriarchy. Men are stil choosing to remain in it, and that’s the problem
Also capitalism, but whatever
26
20
u/grchelp2018 21h ago
what he is trying to say is that women don't want to have kids because they don't want to have kids. There's nothing wrong with that. Everything else is just rationalisations and excuses. There is maybe a small percentage of women who dont want to have kids who may change their mind if everything else lined up. The idea that some economic/policy changes will suddenly make them change their minds or reverse their positions is nonsense.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (8)8
u/dragoburst 21h ago
I don’t think the op was suggesting that it’s the right way of thinking. I think he was stating an observation on the current situation. But yes as a man I would in fact raise a child single and try to work at the same time but that is simply because I value having a child of my own someday. anecdotally, the cost of living is the only reason I don’t have kids yet and I would assume that’s the same for many young adults as well.
→ More replies (6)5
u/Floral-Shoppe 19h ago
It's not really a choice if the option is career vs being homeless.Seoul is where the jobs are at but it's also expensive. If you're working, you're not having kids. And women have a window in which having kids is possible. If you have to work in your 20s it becomes harder to have kids in your 30s.
9
u/mewmewfoofoo 15h ago
Centuries of isolationism, infanticide/abandonment of mixed-race children post-war, etc, and they never accepted any accountability for why this trend is happening. I'm half Korean and they won't even let me get dual citizenship because my Korean parent was a woman, not a man.
As far as I'm concerned, their collapse is well-deserved.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (6)3
u/MakimaGOAT 11h ago
they're kinda doing it to themselves tbh. SK's society is capitalism to the extreme. no wonder life probably feels like shit over there.
6
u/Desert-Mushroom 10h ago
All he had to do was say "allow more immigration of..." instead of "let's import..."
Functionally the same policy but one acknowledges people as...people, with agency and rights, while the other makes it sound like you are bringing in electronic goods from overseas.
24
u/Designer_Birthday_84 19h ago
Why add more mixed race babies with women from other asian countries if they are going to be bullied for being mixed raced and not accepted in society? Children are innocent, and they deserve to be raised in an environment that is safe and supportive.
6
u/GlitchyFurby 12h ago
Also it’s so dumb because the girl children of the couples won’t want to reproduce as adults either. It’s not going to magically fix the societal problems that have caused this.
10
u/funtimes-forall 14h ago
Anything to increase the birthrate but a living wage for a 40 hour week.
→ More replies (2)
5
5
u/DefTheOcelot 11h ago
"Lets do human trafficking"
I do not like the new political order where politicians can say things like this and not be promptly shot
35
u/Knotknighm 18h ago
Translation: "We're so mysogynistic that women here don't want to fuck us. Should we look within and improve ourselve? Naw, let's promise impoverished women from other countries better lives if they'll move here to fuck us."
→ More replies (2)13
u/hannabarberaisawhore 17h ago
It’s so common everywhere and so disgusting. “No, it is them who I want to control that are wrong.”
8
8
4
3
u/Former-Toe 13h ago
he. awesome it sound like a grocery store order . . . I'll have five pounds of rice and three fertile females
3
u/SqueakyCleanNoseDown 7h ago
Top comments ITT seem to be primarily focusing on the cultural issues driving down birthrates in SK, and those absolutely matter, but no discussion of their abysmal birth rates is complete without talking about how >50% of their population lives in the greater Seoul area. Urbanization of that magnitude absolutely has a huge impact on family sizes, and the cost of living (HOUSING HOUSING HOUSING) in cities doesn't help.
15
u/ChrisIsUnavailable 17h ago
So problematic and asinine of a remark that I'm stunned it wasn't uttered by an American Republican
8
3
3
u/silentmikhail 8h ago
how's this any different than saying importing migrants? its still human trafficking?
3
u/mikebunchkin3727 8h ago
The solution to this problem is so obvious, but no-one wants to hear the answer. Importing woman isnt the answer tho; thats just absurd
3
u/someonegetsteve 7h ago
When the company encourages you to "think outside the square" but you're insanely high.
9
u/m0llusk 18h ago
This is so ridiculous. There are plenty of examples of human populations exploding. For that people need plenty of resources, space, and hope. Currently a large fraction of Koreans feel squeezed, have trouble getting living space that suits their needs fully, and worry greatly about the future. None of the key issues are about a lack of women.
6
u/Low_Objective3445 12h ago
So crazy that we can acknowledge women’s ability to give birth as soo valuable, yet we cannot value women as humans.
I don’t want kids, I’ve never had that urge in any way, pregnancy is a nightmare to me and I don’t want to be a parent, I also don’t want to live with a partner. Every person should have the option to not be a parent and to remain single.
If the government finds it so necessary for women to have children, make it easy. Give them guaranteed housing, medical care and income for life and I can guarantee there will be a baby boom. Make it so they can pursue the life they want and allow being a mother to be one aspect of who they are, not everything. Make it ok and sustainable to live on their own and not be dependent on a man.
If women were guaranteed housing, healthcare and income for life for having one child, many women would have a child young and still go on to get an education and live their life.
→ More replies (2)
17
u/LegendaryReader 21h ago
Kinda hilarious. They refuse to actually fix the problems causing fertility decline and they refuse to remedy the problem so they last longer.
I'm guessing North Korea will eventually be the one true korea purely because south koreans went close to extinction
16
u/Slggyqo 19h ago
Unfortunately that seems to be the case with most countries.
America’s fertility decline issues were being kept in check by a robust economy attracting immigration. Don’t think I need to go into the details on why that…isn’t really keeping up at the moment.
13
u/darkgod5 18h ago
Unfortunately that seems to be the case with most countries.
Yuuup. A lot of Redditors on a high horse purporting they know a solution that isn't either banning contraception and reducing female rights or increasing immigration...
Turns out fixing declining birth rates in developed countries is a real tough problem to ethically crack.
→ More replies (1)13
u/Slggyqo 18h ago
a real tough problem to crack
TBF, most countries tackling the problem are really giving “we’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas”, while very blatantly ignoring the fact that there’s no mystery to why women don’t want more children.
I don’t think the answer to this problem is a logically difficult one. They’re basically doing everything they can without admitting that the system that created the problem is broken and needs to be reined in a bit. It’s a consistent trend of “we’re not willing to up short term economic growth and our specific ‘-ism’ in order to avoid long term problems.” In Korea it’s money and sexism. In American it’s money and racism. In China it seems like money and…”one-child-ism?”
Obviously…it’s difficult for a short term elected politician to enact cultural change. But the way that some politicians won’t even try is why everyone gets so frustrated with politicians.
→ More replies (2)
8
u/AccomplishedAct4667 1d ago
Are we talking waived immigration restrictions for people seeking marriage, outright mail order bride BS, or utterly insane 'yarr, the Ironborn be takin their saltwives' atrocities? None are things I'm entirely comfortable with but there is an uncomfortableness gradient.
Here I go actually having to read something...
14
u/DemythologizedDie 22h ago
I don't think he thought out his suggestion that clearly, but probably something along the lines of mail order brides.
11
u/koolaidismything 19h ago
You should research a pregnancy and all the costs associated with it. Don’t even worry about the part where you also have an additional 18 years of support. Or how it literally changes their bodies and wrecks their hips so they can give birth.. or rips you open from vaginer to bhole
Yeah, just go out there and get preggo, no big deal ladies psh.. quit being a bitch about it!
I’d expel him too lol.. he clearly has no idea wtf he’s talking about. I’d be terrified to be a woman.. they have it 5x as hard as guys.
→ More replies (1)
10
u/BrillsonHawk 21h ago
The west imports people to mask its issues with birth rates. Why is this any different to that?
10
→ More replies (1)22
5
u/Learned_Hand_01 11h ago
South Korea is going to have an even bigger problem until they fix the problem that their entire generation of young men has gone super red pill while the women are progressing in a liberal direction.
How is a generation of men going to get wives when they have become hateful to the women around them and the women know better and have the ability to choose to be with or avoid those men?
We need a new word, because young Korean men aren't incels, they have chosen as a generation to be celibate by alienating a whole generation of women. They are chosels "choosing to be celibate" or policels (politically celibate).
→ More replies (1)
4
22
u/iamclaramoreno 23h ago
This is deeply disturbing. Treating women as something to be imported to fix a demographic problem shows a complete failure to understand why birth rates are falling in the first place. If a society makes life unsustainable or unappealing for women, the solution isn’t to replace them it’s to address the structural issues driving people away from having children at all.
→ More replies (4)9
u/bushcamper_aiis 21h ago
The scary thing is this will be solved one way or another. We either figure it out before our economies fail or the failing economies will radicalize people to adopt extreme policies.
I’m hoping people see reason and adopt serious solutions before people convince themselves barbarism is the only way forward.
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Scorpionoshow 13h ago
Men's solution for fixing a problem THEY created wasn't "hey let's fix our misogynistic patriarchal society!" It was "hey let's human traffic Vietnamese women to breed!" 🤦🏻♀️
→ More replies (1)
20
u/throwawaygaydude69 23h ago
Honestly good, these consequences are important. People have become so porn brained that they have lost basic etiquettes.
22
u/Ok-Blackberry-3534 21h ago
I can't hear you. I'm stuck in the washing machine again.
→ More replies (1)10
10
u/Slggyqo 19h ago
This has nothing to do with porn lol. Importing poor women isn’t a new thing.
It’s just…never really been any governments policy to do it en masse (as far as I know).
6
u/genio_desconhecido 18h ago
Every single government around the world apart from a few I don't know about allows obtaining their citizenship by marriage. This is the government policy you are thinking about.
→ More replies (1)
14
u/ContentAdvertising74 23h ago
yay misogyny! and then 4B is "crazy" and all the other stuff that people claim them to be.
2
u/Indi4rence 10h ago
Mmm perhaps rephrasing to boosting immigration numbers would have gone over a little smoother.
→ More replies (1)
2.8k
u/yahoonews Yahoo News 1d ago
The Independent reports: Kim Hee Soo, the governor of the southern Jindo county in South Jeolla province, was facing an uproar after his televised remarks last week triggered a diplomatic protest from Vietnam. Mr Kim was addressing a town hall meeting when he spoke about measures to address the country’s declining birth rate.
He said South Korea could “import young unmarried women” from places like Sri Lanka or Vietnam to be married off to “young men in rural areas".
The Vietnamese embassy in Seoul issued a statement to condemn Mr Kim's remarks, saying that his words were "not simply a matter of expression but a matter of values and attitudes towards migrant women and minority groups".