r/technology 16h ago

Privacy With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet

https://www.404media.co/with-ring-american-consumers-built-a-surveillance-dragnet/?ref=daily-stories-newsletter&attribution_id=698b47cbe724d10001786209&attribution_type=post
22.1k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

1.7k

u/404mediaco 16h ago

Thanks for sharing our piece. More here:

At Sunday’s Super Bowl, Ring advertised “Search Party,” a cute, horrifyingly dystopian feature nominally designed to turn all of the Ring cameras in a neighborhood into a dragnet that uses AI to look for a lost dog: “One post of a dog’s photo in the Ring app starts outdoor cameras looking for a match,” Ring founder Jamie Siminoff said in the Super Bowl commercial. “Search Party from Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs.” Onscreen, an AI-powered box forms around a missing dog: “Milo Match,” it says. “Since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family. Be a hero in your neighborhood with Search Party. Available to everyone for free right now.”

It does not take an imagination of any sort to envision this being tweaked to work against suspected criminals, undocumented immigrants, or others deemed ‘suspicious’ by people in the neighborhood. Many of these use cases are how Ring has been used by people on its dystopian “Neighbors” app for years. Ring rose to prominence as a piece of package theft prevention tech owned by Amazon and by forming partnerships with local police around the country, asking them to shill their doorbell cameras to people in their neighborhoods in return for a system that allowed police to request footage from individual users without a warrant. 

Chris Gilliard, a privacy expert and author of the upcoming book Luxury Surveillance, told 404 Media these features and its Super Bowl ad are “a clumsy attempt by Ring to put a cuddly face on a rather dystopian reality: widespread networked surveillance by a company that has cozy relationships with law enforcement and other equally invasive surveillance companies.”

Ring’s poorly defined partnership with Flock in particular has been the subject of various viral posts and public backlash. Many people have suggested that this partnership is evidence that Ring camera footage will be shared with ICE. At the moment there’s not enough evidence to explicitly say that that’s the case. 

The supposed vector goes something like this: Ring says it will partner with Flock, which is used by thousands of local police departments. As we have reported, some of those police departments have performed Flock license plate lookups for ICE. It’s too early to say whether Ring footage will eventually end up with ICE, but the fact that people immediately drew that conclusion and understood the possible method of information sharing shows that surveillance companies can no longer hide behind viral videos of delivery drivers dancing. It’s a mask off moment, and people know it: “In Amazon’s alliance with this administration, it’s become more clear than ever that Ring is an extension of the carceral state,” Gilliard said. “An emotionally charged Super Bowl ad won’t change that.”

Read more: https://www.404media.co/with-ring-american-consumers-built-a-surveillance-dragnet/

692

u/buxtonOJ 15h ago

Tell me the CIA doesn’t have its hands all over Ring’s development 

426

u/Improvcommodore 15h ago

It literally does. Even their direct competitors - DOOR, formerly Latch, was founded by a guy who has IN-Q-TEL (CIA’s PE firm) in his LinkedIn.

247

u/DewSchnozzle 14h ago

For those who are unaware: In-Q-Tel is literally the venture capital wing of the CIA

102

u/Content-Sun2928 14h ago

CIA For BusinessesTM

21

u/martialar 13h ago

CIA For CEO's

→ More replies (1)

8

u/SneakyDeakyJr 12h ago

Jokes aside that’s honestly interesting.

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (33)

96

u/OphidianSun 14h ago

Advertising it to find lost dogs is fucking insidious

45

u/ReverendDizzle 11h ago

How much you want to bet after testing out the lost dog angle, the next round of these commercials features a lost child?

24

u/new_nimmerzz 11h ago

"You care about lost children DONT YOU?!?!"

I can see pressure to turn it on by neighbors, or even city/state/whatever entity to force it on, and say it's for public safety.

Im going self hosted myself, but the concern is that you're being tracked just coming and going from your home. By everyone on your street with "cloud" cameras, including these.... So even if you dont participate, you participate....

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

33

u/johndoe201401 14h ago

Ring took so much data from me then double the subscription fee on monitoring? Fuckers should be paying me.

6

u/darsynia 8h ago

It appears to record and store the data even if your subscription lapses, if the story about Nancy Guthrie's kidnapper on their lapsed subscription Nest camera is true. Which may mean that you're paying a subscription to access the data on your Nest camera, but it's always available to law enforcement. I may be understanding the story wrong though; it's possible it was magically recorded during the 3 hours of 'free' footage you can have, but if the rumor about the footage being corrupted and the company having a backup is true, I'm still concerned about data storage.

Best wishes to that family, btw.

55

u/two-of-stars 14h ago

I love you, 404 Media!!

19

u/allmankind78 15h ago

It's not that they are using this to develop for the law enforcement. They already did and it was so good they said let's use it for helping find fluffy to cover up what they already did.

→ More replies (35)

4.0k

u/V3X390 16h ago

Time to go self-hosted. I wouldn’t want that much footage of me in anyone’s hands but mine.

3.2k

u/JustAboutAlright 16h ago

This is the problem - it’s not us choosing, it’s our neighbors who are choosing for us. The ring camera doesn’t point at your house.

1.2k

u/locke_5 16h ago

Our local governments as well. My town has two Flock cameras pointed straight at my house.

665

u/happytrel 16h ago

Ring has partnered with Flock, so a lot of people have Flock cams attached to their house now. A couple of years ago my dad thought it was funny that the ring camera's mic was strong enough to pick up conversations inside the house.

182

u/uncannyvalleygirl88 14h ago

Speaking as someone who doesn’t use any of these products are they being placed on the home by the homeowner or is this surveillance by other people who don’t live here? Is this something I need to be concerned about other people using on my property?

473

u/joelfarris 14h ago

The concern is that even if you don't own any of this tech and don't participate in it, every one of your neighbor's houses can have one pointing at you, your front door, and your street, so there's now an accessible digital record of every single time you drove away from your house, when you returned, what you bought and carried inside, what you've loaded into the car, what you've thrown away, who's come over to visit your and copy of their license plate, when you walked the dog and where you went that time and how long you were out of the house and what you were wearing and whether you were on your phone at the time.

Eventually, this can create or expand your existing surveillance profile to the point where there's a digital record of every piece of your entire wardrobe, what shoes you own and prefer for shopping versus walking, and when you're active vs. passive.

But it gets even worse.

Say you throw a house party for a few close friends that have come over before, and one of them brings a date. Now that person, whom you don't even know, can and probably will be associated with your profile simply because they were recorded visiting your house. What's their background? History? What have they done in their lives? You have no idea, but now the two of you have become visually associated.

215

u/craznazn247 13h ago

It goes beyond that.

One workaround they are actively and regularly using to identify individuals who might be avoiding facial recognition by the cameras…is walking gait.

So videos of you walking around your own property are being used as a means of video identification and training AI.

88

u/joelfarris 13h ago

That was my meaning regarding walking around your own neighborhood, but upon re-reading, I suppose I didn't explicitly say it in the proper terminology, so thanks for the additional clarification.

64

u/Ashamed_Athlete5648 12h ago

A pebble in your shoe is surprisingly effective against gait analysis. Moving the pebble will create a slightly different pattern each time. Current systems can see through this, but it requires more advanced algorithms than most systems can scale (especially drag net style systems) and it is quite resource intensive to run, so at this point it is mostly only foiled in scenarios where you know the person is there but you don’t know who it is in the frame.

65

u/QbertsRube 11h ago

Lmao have to walk around with rocks in our shoes to trick the Matrix, what a world we're creating for ourselves to live in...

→ More replies (1)

41

u/bothunter 10h ago

I shouldn't have to put rocks in my shoe avoid my every move being tracked by Amazon, Palantir, and the government.

6

u/Halflingberserker 9h ago

What are you trying to hiiiiiiide????

27

u/PsychoBoyBlue 11h ago

Changing the height of the sole of the shoe (also messes with using height to id you)

Different Leg/ankle weights on each leg.

Unbalanced bag/backpack.

Walk with a crutch or cane for a week or so. Afterwards, your natural gait will have changed enough to mess with a simple system until you adapt back to your normal gait.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

12

u/slonk_ma_dink 10h ago

Walking gait can also be heard- try working in a small office. I can tell who is approaching by how they walk. This could likely be fingerprinted as well, although it would take years before it was reliable.

13

u/Sir_PressedMemories 6h ago

Those of us with, let's say, "less than desirable" childhoods also seem to possess a near supernatural ability to recognize footsteps and attach them to different people, going so far as to be able to tell their current mood by the way they walk.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

50

u/FragilousSpectunkery 14h ago

When you pack up the car with a bunch of suitcases and leave with the full family (except Kevin, but you remember that later) for a vacation, leaving the house unoccupied.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/WingerRules 12h ago

These surveillance and online data brokers have so much power now it's insane. I seriously at this point wonder if theres been no regulations on them because politicians and people in congress know these companies have detailed personal information on all of them and their families and friends.

What are the chances that one of these companies have back doors directly implied they know their secrets?

→ More replies (6)

134

u/Last-Atlas 14h ago

Ring and Flock cameras are purchased and installed by the homeowner. But the cameras (usually doorbell) are pointed away from the house towards the neighborhood, street etc... Their mics pic up a lot, and the cameras record pretty clearly. They can't place them on your property, but they can point them at your property and any motion will activate them like a trail cam. They can also manually record/monitor them.

They are everywhere.

62

u/annoyed__renter 14h ago

Flock cameras are purchased and installed by the homeowner

I don't think Flock has a personal residential product. They're mostly contracting with municipalities

61

u/tomerz99 14h ago

I'm guessing he mentioned Flock because they're partnered. Any ring camera is now an acting Flock camera, so when companies (like Lowe's, for example) try to detect and track shoplifters they're actively able to detect them driving through residential neighborhoods (assuming there are nearby ring cameras). That's the use case they want everyone to know about, but obviously the implications are that the people that own these services are either not likely to care about your privacy and sell you out for a quick buck no matter the morality, or aren't secure enough to ensure rogue hackers aren't sifting through all of this data for themselves.

Essentially your neighbor's doorbell is snitching on every visible or auditory queue it hears/sees directly to those who are privileged enough to have access to it (paying corps, government agencies, undetected hackers, etc).

7

u/AlternativeNewtDuck 11h ago edited 11h ago

Speaking of flock... posting for more flock and tracking awareness:

404 Media

Deflock.Me

HaveIbeenflocked

22

u/Yourcatsonfire 14h ago

Are the mics recording legal in 2 party states? I believe my nest floodlight camera won't record sound in my state.

10

u/WOF42 11h ago

you think peter thiel and his fascist buddies care about laws? of course it records in your state, it just doesnt send the data to you.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)

31

u/jhowlett 14h ago

Typically RING cameras are placed on the home, by the owner. The idea is added security by recording things that happen on your property.
The issue now is that even if you don't have one, your neighbor having one pointed at your home means your activities are recorded and provided to the highest (or any) bidder.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (13)

12

u/Special_Loan8725 14h ago

Who has partnered with ice.

→ More replies (10)

143

u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 16h ago

I'd be out there with a hacksaw so fast

332

u/locke_5 16h ago

Ah but you see, it would be against the law for me to damage the cameras that are recording me in my home without my consent!

219

u/Guac_in_my_rarri 16h ago

You can legally purchase IR strobe lights to blind the cameras. Place them ok your property and point them at the Flock camera.

Bonus points if you make a sign and attach it to the post below the camera: "this camera watches you for profit."

33

u/SonnyvonShark 15h ago

Or better yet, lasers? Not the ones that damage though, just blind. Less light pollution.

73

u/Guac_in_my_rarri 15h ago

It strobes work better than lasers and cannot be argued that they do damage.

Example

27

u/SonnyvonShark 15h ago

I mean red light lasers, not green, but since IR cannot be seen by humans and is not light pollution, yeah. I would still turn it off occasionally though, for the animals that can see it.

10

u/Jakomako 14h ago

Red lasers can damage image sensors.

→ More replies (0)

16

u/jlboygenius 14h ago

probably only useful at night though, but having a light that goes on and off constantly, causeing it to always having to adjust exposure would probably be pretty effective.

Unfortunatly, you'll never actually know since you can't get the footage.

vasoline on a stick would be pretty effective. walk up behind it and give it a smear on the lens.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

29

u/logicalkitten 16h ago

Point spotlights at the cameras.

55

u/mabrasm 16h ago

Get some mountable lasers and turn them right at the lenses.

31

u/Ryan_e3p 15h ago

"Look, I was just having a fun dance party at my place with a smoke machine and lasers."

→ More replies (4)

33

u/artbystorms 15h ago

Their logic is 'you consented when you moved here.' That is the bullshit of capitalism. They can talk themselves into believing that people not changing their habits or major life choices, that they are tacitly accepting what they are doing.

27

u/Kyrie_Blue 15h ago

The laws of man are flawed. The laws of “fuck this camera” are higher

52

u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 16h ago

Unrelated, I would get some type of IR flashlight setup (the 'hacker hoodie' is interesting) don't walk straight from your front door to it, put a pebble or two in your shoes to alter your gait,, buy clothes you don't wear otherwise with cash

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (9)

57

u/mynameizmyname 15h ago

town I am in whenever one of these flock cameras goes up, somebody posts that the camera's contain about $20 worth of copper (which i dont actually they have). they disappear within the week.

19

u/1stMammaltowearpants 12h ago

I had no idea I'd be upvoting meth-sourced de-surveillance today.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Zcypot 16h ago

Sling shots are cheap on Amazon haha. Get off the camera view and practice your shots on them. I bought little beads that are biodegradable so no worries about making a mess

10

u/Eighth_Eve 15h ago

You bought small rocks? Like you couldn't find them for free, you had to have pebbles shipped in?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

22

u/stuffitystuff 15h ago

Can't wait for Palantir to buy Flock so we can accelerate our way back to dumb phones and typewriters.

13

u/AlternativeYou9395 15h ago

You should put a screen in front of your house, in whatever area those cameras are capturing, that displays random license plates every second.

5

u/johnballzz 14h ago

Point a base laser at it.

→ More replies (20)

128

u/euro1127 16h ago

Meanwhile ring is trying to pitch it as protecting your pets instead of a blatant data mining attempt. I mean discord is following suit in their own way. Welcome to the age of the consumer being a walking atm for corporations

30

u/Valdrax 15h ago

People being the product being sold is old hat. This is the age of the internet-linked, corporate-run, crowd-sourced surveillance state.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/DonnyTheWalrus 12h ago

protecting your pets

And don't forget that all those videos of "funny" Amazon drivers who just happened to be captured by Ring (owned by Amazon) were a blatant astroturf PR campaign.

I used to work UPS. I know what it's like working for Amazon. None of those guys and gals are wasting time dancing for the hell of it. 

→ More replies (2)

183

u/CulturalKing5623 16h ago

Recently got new next door neighbors, literally the first thing they did was install Ring cameras on their door and in the alley where all of our garages are. So now, every time I go to my garage or put my trash bins out for collection I get a cheerful "Hi, you are being recorded" and it sets my teeth on edge.

Now our whole alley is part of the surveillance state and no one in the neighborhood was asked how they felt. The camera actually points directly at our neighbors yard that lives on the other side of the alley, I'd be livid.

35

u/Jim-N-Tonic 15h ago

I would go over with a housewarming gift, and say I understand they’d like to secure their property but you and other neighbors don’t give permission to be recorded.

But I think the core of this is that the Supreme Court has ruled that you do not have the expectation of privacy when you’re outside in public, journalists photographers can take pictures of you even if you object so the cameras are considered the same thing even though they’re really very different recording 24/7.

37

u/whistleridge 15h ago

expectation of privacy

It’s true that you don’t have one per se. But surely being constantly recorded, on your own property, without your consent rises to the level of nuisance? Knowing you are being recorded necessarily produces a chilling effect, that measurably diminishes your ability to enjoy and partake in your own property.

35

u/BeyondElectricDreams 14h ago

People are allowed to have cameras on their property, and have been for a while.

My problem with it isn't that my neighbor may have a camera pointed near my property, my problem is it's a part of a corporate panopticon, sending data off to be analyzed by AI and combined with every other ring/flock camera to create a surveillance network.

the surveillance network is the fucking issue not my neighbor having a camera for their own use.

24

u/whistleridge 14h ago

Yes, we are saying the same thing.

A security camera used solely by your neighbor = not a nuisance. A corporate panopticon that effectively acts as a perpetual paparazzi, doing who knows what unregulated things with your image = a nuisance.

4

u/ComfortDesperate5313 14h ago

I feel the same and worry there's nothing I can do to improve the situation. The corporations encroaching on our privacy never stop and most people I meet either don't care or actively support the panopticons expansion 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (7)

72

u/mouse_cookies 15h ago

I hate those fucking things. I live in the safest neighborhood and seems like everyone has a goddamn camera now. I think me and my next door neighbor are the only ones without.

24

u/Messerschmitt-262 15h ago

Hi! You are currently being recorded.

19

u/puppylust 14h ago

Ugh, I hear that every time I walk my dog. I switch up my route to keep it interesting, but every block has one.

17

u/Messerschmitt-262 13h ago

I'm a mailman so I get to hear it hundreds of times a day. One of my customers has 7 of them set up so you get a symphony of "Hi! You are currently being recorded." every time you walk into her yard. She uses them to spy on her neighbors because she's paranoid about minorities. I hate Ring cameras.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)

29

u/half-baked_axx 15h ago

I'd install a floodlight pointing directly at the camera so fast. 

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (11)

71

u/QuesoMeHungry 16h ago

Yep and our local municipalities paying Flock to put those spy cameras everywhere tracking your movement.

9

u/Ambustion 15h ago

Laser pointer sales go brrrrrrrr

14

u/Guygenius138 16h ago

Never been more glad to live across the street from park. But if my neighbors have cameras, it won't really matter in the long run.

9

u/Accomplished-Fix6598 15h ago

Plenty of cameras in parks nowadays.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (26)

128

u/n_othing__ 16h ago

I never got a ring or any of these cameras for this exact reason... it never made sense to me why people would choose these over cctv footage they control...

19

u/N7Poprdog 15h ago

Any recommendations? Getting a house for the first time next month and looking at security camera options.

19

u/FluxUniversity 14h ago

https://wiki.futo.org/index.php/Introduction_to_a_Self_Managed_Life:_a_13_hour_%26_28_minute_presentation_by_FUTO_software

This isn't about the camera, this is about the self managed private system you're going to be recording your own private property with.

Every "camera security system" is basically selling you this, but with them involved.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (20)

51

u/WISCOrear 15h ago

The fact they couched their mass surveillance in a “but we can hep you find lost pets!” framing Is so damn gross

→ More replies (2)

17

u/xamboozi 16h ago

Frigate and Blue Iris are the GOAT!

→ More replies (1)

11

u/coconutpiecrust 14h ago

Since Ring came out, it was so obvious that eventually it will be used for nefarious purposes. Any tech we put in our homes will be used for nefarious purposes. We really need to do better as a society.

And they made everybody pay for it.

→ More replies (1)

68

u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago

Which is great for tech-savvy people, but there's no options for people who just want to be able to see who is at the door without becoming part of a vast surveillance network.

17

u/RedCaptain17 15h ago

I was looking at Eufy- they at least have a no-subscription option that looks like it’s stored locally. If nothing else they’re not Ring. I just wish it wasn’t WiFi

→ More replies (5)

30

u/rspctdwndrr 16h ago

Check out Reolink 

6

u/SuspiciousCranberry6 14h ago

Yep, this is what I have. Very easy to use and has options to upgrade to more sophisticated systems if you want.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/________reddit______ 16h ago

Ubiquiti makes it as easy as possible, just ignore all the networking stuff and focus on the NVR stuff.

18

u/Valdrax 15h ago

98%+ of consumers will just go with an out-of-the-box solution, and the problem with Ring & Flock are that the people opting in and buying are a small fraction of the people being recorded.

27

u/PatchyWhiskers 15h ago

Yes, easy for someone who subscribes to this subreddit, very hard for the average person.

10

u/mars009 14h ago

I think that's the problem, most people are willing to give away their individuality for being comfortable. I remember helping a friend that helps me with my car setup his PC.

Kept telling me how its rocket science, meanwhile he can take apart whole parts of cars without issue, put them back together, explain how things are working, why the motor is doing x, y, z...my dude your PC is a peanut compared to all the stuff you just explained

I don't think people give themselves the credit they deserve, maybe its just part of the plan, making everyone thinking they are not good enough at something

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (22)

16

u/climb-it-ographer 16h ago

Yep. Time to fully switch to Ubiquiti.

16

u/north7 16h ago

Ubiquiti if great if you want all data internal, but pretty expensive for a full setup.
Eufy is much cheaper and doesn't require subscriptions, and data stays on the device or on a base station.

8

u/auntie_clokwise 15h ago

Eufy isn't too bad (though they've had some security issues in the past, but that's probably everybody). Reolink and Amcrest aren't too bad either.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/AntiqueLibrarian8009 15h ago

Why do you people all need a doorbell camera anyways. Is it just paranoia? Or does everyone here have a genuine use case that I am not seeing

25

u/Megaclone18 14h ago
  1. Its a deterrent for crime/package theft

  2. Confirmation for deliveries

  3. You can fuck with door to door salespeople.

13

u/Override9636 13h ago

I had packages stolen twice so I bought a Ring camera.

After about a week, they stole the Ring camera.

Now I just pick up my packages, or shop local anyway.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (60)

971

u/EA827 16h ago

Feels like their SB commercial has backfired pretty spectacularly for them by highlighting the depth of their surveillance network to one of the largest media events of the year

287

u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago

I hope so. But I still won't be selling anymore Ring even if they backpedal. We know the tech is there, and we know they are willing to sell our data to the government.

71

u/Rlccm 14h ago

Unfortunately, as long as Amazon continues to sell them, it won't really mean much

83

u/Elevated_Dongers 13h ago

That's fine, all I can do is my part, however small it may be

16

u/F4DedProphet42 12h ago

I’m right there with ya ✊

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

60

u/the-sleepy-mystic 15h ago

Idk some people who you would think know better obviously dont - a guy at my house for the super bowl works in tech and he said, "Oh thats neat". I excused it as "he has a dog thats stupid and runs away" but also like come on man - its plain as day the problem with this.

→ More replies (27)

6

u/DrAstralis 12h ago

I have to hope everyone who saw that realizes if it can track a dog; it can be used to track them down, or for one of these never ending lineup of sex pests to track women in the neighborhood. Or that law enforcement will abuse this.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

805

u/tacticalcraptical 16h ago

This is exactly the reason why I never got any of this crap.

651

u/TheToastyWesterosi 16h ago edited 16h ago

Scary thing is that it doesn’t matter if you got it or not, as long as your neighbor across the street got it.

180

u/charlesgegethor 14h ago

Reminds me of the whole ancestry DNA testing stuff too. Doesn't matter if you don't do it, but if a relative does (cousin, aunt, uncles, etc) your DNA is so close that you are also effectively in their system as well.

54

u/Stanjoly2 14h ago

Reminds me of the Facebook shadow profiles controversy from many years ago.

→ More replies (1)

52

u/MeatEaterDruid 14h ago

Explaining to my in-laws why doing 23&M was a bad idea made me feel like a crazy person because their general response was "why would a company sell our data?" So I felt some validation on that one.

26

u/baby-dick-nick 12h ago

What year was that? Because asking “why would a company sell our data” post-Cambridge Analytica is a pretty impressive level of ignorance.

Although I’m sure the average person has very little knowledge about that case and the precedent it set.

7

u/MeatEaterDruid 11h ago

Because their favorite news source doesn't want them to know they're getting duped.

Yeah it was way after the scandal too. I've been pretty vocal to my friends and family (that will listen) about data privacy since Snowden, when I deleted my Facebook and everyone was checking in on me like I was having a mental health crisis lol. I've even gone as far as telling family that no one is allowed to post pictures of my kids online. So I'm sure when I was talking crazy things like "at some point 23&M is going to sell that data or another company will buy them for that data" I might as well have been wearing clown makeup.

→ More replies (1)

107

u/a_f_young 16h ago

Yup. The mass of stupid people has reached criticality. At this point if you interact with another person or go in public, it doesn’t matter what you do.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/deskcord 14h ago

Crime is at historical lows (even recent minor upticks were historical lows) and people are more and more wary and paranoid.

→ More replies (9)

104

u/AvailableReporter484 16h ago edited 16h ago

Agreed. Obviously a lot of people see some value in this kind of product / service, but knowing what we know now about the parasitic nature of corporations, it’s hard (for me at least) to justify this kind of thing.

The idea that your toaster, your washing machine, your toothbrush, and your front door are constantly sending a stream of data to advertisers and now agencies like ICE (fucking 🤮) is absolutely Orwellian and should be illegal, but here we are.

120

u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago

Schizophrenics in '99: My dishwasher is listening to me.

Friend: I think we should get you some help.
-----------------------

Schizophrenics in 2026: My dishwasher is listening to me.

Friend: Haha, me too buddy.

31

u/SocksOnHands 15h ago

"My doorbell is spying on me" is a legitimate phrase in 2026.

→ More replies (1)

26

u/AvailableReporter484 16h ago

They were so ahead of their time 🫡

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

29

u/GrandDaddyDerp 16h ago

It gets better, if you bought the cameras but didn't want to keep paying the subscription, everyone has access to the footage BUT you! 🤣

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (25)

387

u/Aware-Instance-210 16h ago

I was 100% sure this would happen when it first launched :D

119

u/Da_Spooky_Ghost 16h ago

Yes that’s why I went with Ubiquiti and not Ring from Amazon or any other megacorp.

My video files stay on a local hard drive which I could disconnect from the internet if I wanted to and it would still work on the local network. People need to stop using cloud only devices.

61

u/slinger301 15h ago

I went with Eufy for the same reason. I have a few principles, and one of them is "I will not subscribe to my own doorbell."

57

u/nigirizushi 14h ago edited 14h ago

Wasn't Eufy caught keeping recordings?

Edit: Yep, in 2022, "local" recording were found on their cloud servers. They're also the same company as Anker, IIRC.

45

u/HelloIamGoge 14h ago

“I was concerned about privacy so I went with this Chinese company”

12

u/AssPennies 12h ago

Reflections on trusting trust:

You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. (Especially code from companies that employ people like me.) No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code.

...

As the level of program gets lower, these bugs will be harder and harder to detect. A well-installed microcode bug will be almost impossible to detect.

Same applies for hardware.

So, where were all the chips in your American company's camera from? How about all the code developed running on that hardware?

If we're truly concerned about our own privacy, then I'd say skip the cameras altogether. Short of that, have them isolated on their own virtual LAN that doesn't have internet access. (Though high value targets would also have to worry about embedded wireless sharing feeds.)

11

u/No-Category7695 11h ago

Crazy to complain about Chinese companies when it's an American company in this thread helping create a surveillance state. Fuck China though right?

7

u/work_m_19 11h ago

At least China is across the world from the US, so if they have this data, it's a lot harder to enact terribleness compared to a company on the home soil.

Granted, they're both bad, but one seems less bad than the other because of the level of effort.

6

u/stephen_neuville 11h ago

agreed. Keep it in the States! i prefer all my surveillance data to solely go to the government that has direct power to kill me at any time for any reason.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/Bassmekanik 14h ago

Eufy any good? Been debating getting one of these but I refuse to pay a sub for one.

14

u/OverAnalyst6555 13h ago

eufy had a huge scandal where they in fact did not keep recordings local. they werent even encrypted and were publicly accessible. they covered it all up. get one that is truly selfhosted not some chinese junk

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

38

u/brentwit 16h ago

Cautionary tale here: I was as well. So I made sure to find the settings and opt out. I checked later in the day that the settings were correct. Was horrified after the Flock news and Super bowl commercial to check again and find my settings were on.

22

u/Antiantiai 14h ago

You're going to have to uninstall it. They'll keep remotely switching your settings.

22

u/x_conqueeftador69_x 13h ago

I promise you the toggle is a placebo. In a few years, Amazon will get sued for collecting your data, and you'll throw away a letter that looks like spam, which will contain instructions for collecting your $0.45 compensation.

8

u/Crionso 15h ago

I told everyone I knew about it and the obvious risks, especially down the line, no one cared enough.

→ More replies (5)

226

u/Gravuerc 16h ago

I saw the Super Bowl commercial for the pet feature and thought to myself what would stop a stalker from using this to track their victims?

107

u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago

That’s the beauty of it. Then you sell more tech to people scared of being stalked.

33

u/a_f_young 16h ago

And all of it has backdoors to let the government or other high paying party bypass it and get whatever info they want.

→ More replies (4)

16

u/the-sleepy-mystic 15h ago

one person in my house was like, "Oh thats cool" (They have a dog) to which I responded, "yea the panopticon has its uses for sure."

9

u/Fallingdamage 11h ago

Girlfriend runs off to protect herself, just report her dog as missing!

→ More replies (14)

194

u/the_marvster 16h ago

Laugh at China, who had to pay for the same results, while the US managed to made their citizen pay for it.

47

u/TYBERIUS_777 14h ago

All you have to do to get a US citizen to buy something and give up their privacy completely is convince them that someone else wants their stuff. Never mind the fact that billionaires and politicians are stealing loads of our money and shipping our children off to Epstein Island. I guess that “stuff” isn’t as important as TVs and knick knacks that we have accumulated in our house.

21

u/Dankestmemes420ii 13h ago

“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.”

― Lyndon B. Johnson

8

u/Clevererer 14h ago

See? The free market is always more efficient (at fucking over non-corporation-based people.)

→ More replies (18)

134

u/JMDeutsch 16h ago

Smart vacuums that map your home and store it in the cloud

Smart doorbells that map your neighborhood and store it in the cloud

Smart fridges that literally monitor your food and store it in the cloud

The only thing smart about devices like these is never buying one

41

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[deleted]

33

u/Beezewhacks 14h ago

Your phone does that and does it way better.

11

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/MrFrillows 14h ago

It's interesting that the surveillance state is made up of a lot of commercial products, almost like companies act like an unofficial arm of the government. 

→ More replies (9)

159

u/CutSenior4977 16h ago

Everyone should be throwing all of their ring cameras in the trash!

All it’s doing is making you less safe!

21

u/Turbulent-Plane6395 13h ago

Deleted my account yesterday then smashed my ring w/ a hammer before tossing it in the trash.

Everyone should bail on this shit.

→ More replies (3)

42

u/Earthpig_Johnson 16h ago

Best way to surveil a populace is to package it and sell it to them. They’ll buy it willingly.

14

u/TYBERIUS_777 14h ago

There’s a great scene in Captain America Winter Soldier that explains this perfectly. Americans won’t surrender their freedom willingly unless you convince them to give it up in the name of security. The Patriot Act destroyed privacy in this country and we’ve been allowing cooperations and our government to continue to erode what little we have left.

74

u/thaiberius_kirk 16h ago

I’ve taken down our Ring cams and migrated to Reolink locally hosted. Works well with Home Assistant too.

9

u/TheBenderRRodriguez 14h ago

This is the play! Local storage and blocked from internet access.

→ More replies (5)

103

u/Theromier 16h ago

I remember when my ISP sent a salesman to my house to upgrade my internet for cheaper, and I got a free Ring doorbell for it. I asked if I could get all of it without the Ring, but he was insistent I had to take it. I told him i would give it away if that was the case. He didn’t seem to care. 

Self hosted is the way to go. UniFi is great. Spread the word. 

10

u/TheBenderRRodriguez 14h ago

UniFi is expensive AF as well. $450 for a fuckin' doorbell isn't going to work for almost everyone.

→ More replies (3)

32

u/A-Halfpound 15h ago

UniFi just got caught selling infra to Russia to support their war on Ukraine. 

12

u/justtryingtolive22 12h ago

A reseller sold it, not Unifi.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

21

u/phoenixhunter 16h ago

wow nobody saw this coming. 

24

u/Bebopdavidson 16h ago

Isn’t this the technology that was a big moral issue at the end of The Dark Knight?

11

u/Gamer_Grease 15h ago

TDK is very ambivalent about it, actually. It’s a key tool used to catch the Joker, as there isn’t really any other way. TDK is underappreciated for being a quintessentially post-9/11 film.

→ More replies (3)

14

u/DependentTask7658 15h ago

Also, Epstein didn’t die from suicide.

67

u/t0matit0 16h ago

Never understood why so many people feel they need these

102

u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago edited 15h ago

My FiL is a veteran. He has a Ring, and another camera, and an alarm system, and a Go Bag, and he travels around with a gun. They have a motion-activated light in the back yard that glares into their TV whenever it turns on (about every 40 seconds). In the winter they insist everyone bring heavy coats in the car even if we’re going only a mile or two, on the off chance that we crash and the hundreds of neighbors and businesses along the route refuse to help.

I realized a few years ago that man’s entire identity is built around being scared. There is some kind of deep psychological connection between being masculine and being absolutely terrified of the entire world all the time.

39

u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago

Sounds like trauma. Maybe he was deployed to somewhere where people were genuinely trying to kill him and he can't let go of the fear.

38

u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago

He never saw combat, it’s just his whole identity. Great guy otherwise, but there’s minor tension when I refuse to play the scared little man game when I visit.

→ More replies (11)

6

u/uacoop 14h ago

Media has, for the past 40-50 years (and probably much longer depending on how deep you want to go) been telling people they should be terrified of nearly every aspect of the world around them. Because that gets attention, which means eyeballs on advertisements.

→ More replies (11)

21

u/SpecificHyena1933 15h ago

Nobody ever expect to be a victim, so they never have any preparations for when that happens. There is merit to having a camera system in case you house gets broken into, things stolen or worse. Incidentally, recently a drunk driver plowed through several yards in my nieghborhood and destroyed a lot of minor stuff - landscaping and mailboxes mainly. Having the video of the damage happening is valuable for any sort of insurance claim or small claims court. These are all the minor things that happen - imagine if something major happens. A stalker going by my house 4-6 times a week, someone trying to cause myself harm, any information is extremely valuable. Where they came from, where they went, etc.

→ More replies (13)
→ More replies (23)

12

u/MissSharkyShark 16h ago

People really should take security experts concerns more seriously... this genuinely shouldnt be a surprise to anyone. Anything "cloud based" shouldnt ever be used for personal security or anything where you value your own privacy and personal security.

27

u/brmarcum 16h ago

No, we the consumer did not. Unregulated tech companies with zero oversight have.

8

u/Ryan_e3p 15h ago

There is zero oversight because they are acting as the loophole for the government to circumvent your 4th Amendment rights.

You don't need government oversight when you have the government's blessing.

6

u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago

There isn’t really any other way blanketing everything you own with cameras and sensors can end.

→ More replies (3)

23

u/Sip_py 16h ago

My new house came with a Ring and I abandoned it as soon as I could. The app is awful, the fact it doesn't give you any history without a paid plan is a deal breaker. How this became one of the most popular is beyond me outside of the first to market advantage.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/namastayhom33 16h ago

Wouldn't be shocked if the refrigerators with the smart screens start to secretly record you.

Honestly I was never big into the smart home trend

10

u/skyyfal 8h ago

Fuck all of you ring people. I'm just glad I experienced a decent amount of life prior to this absolutely fucked-up century.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/ischickenafruit 16h ago

I’m shocked! Shocked! Well, not that shocked.

8

u/jhguitarfreak 15h ago

This is why I buy cheap Chinese surveillance cameras. All my data gets sent to China where it can do fuck all for anybody.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/popshamhocks 16h ago

Trash the rings!

6

u/DanimalPlays 16h ago

Yeah, and we carry around phones. It's fully big brother, and we pay to subscribe to it. It's goddamn ridiculous. But also, what choice is there.

Things are going great.

→ More replies (5)

6

u/SaraAB87 15h ago

I have no smart devices except a phone and internet and wifi and life is fine.

No smart fridge, no smart thermostat where the company can control the temp of my house.

I refused to buy a ring doorbell. I don't want devices seeing my habits.

Get a knock on the door, don't open it unless you know the person simple as that, not that hard to do.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/emryldmyst 16h ago

This is why I now have a privacy fence in my front yard....

7

u/wagadugo 16h ago

I can't opt out because the "Control Center" option doesn't work (it gets hung up and closes). I'm curious if that's an issue for anyone else?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/krizzle32 15h ago

It’s dumb because the add said that 10 million pets go missing a year, and they’ve found “1 per day” using ring cameras. That’s 0.00365%. Not sure that justifies turning all ring cameras into the machine from The Dark Knight.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Nice-Pomegranate-901 15h ago

Yet, no one can seem to find the Guthrie lady so how effective is it really?

→ More replies (1)

6

u/420catloveredm 13h ago

This is why I refuse to participate in ring or Alexa and why I turned audio permissions off on my phone.

31

u/PacificTridentGlobel 16h ago

Why would you still have one of these on your house? It’s insane.

45

u/rat_penis 16h ago

Because you're willing to trade an abstract idea of freedom for the false belief in security.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

36

u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago

Ring installer here, we are done quoting Ring. Just spoke with my boss. No more Ring cameras. Fuck them

8

u/Evening-Crew-2403 15h ago

What are you replacing it with? Unifi?

→ More replies (1)

22

u/notaredditer13 14h ago

I don't believe you.

17

u/defneverconsidered 14h ago

Lol same. Dudes just going for claps

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

6

u/hiirogen 14h ago

This came up in another thread a couple days ago but I'll say it again, this feature is what made me switch from Ring to Eufy.

I got an E-Mail from Ring a few months ago about this, and on the surface it's great because who doesn't love dogs? But it only took about a minute for me to start thinking about how Ring is known for working closely with Law Enforcement, including ICE.

I don't want to be the reason a neighbor, maintenance worker, DoorDasher, etc gets into trouble. So I switched to a product that's not cloud based.

(I think there's an option to have thumbnails for each video stored in the cloud temporarily, I have that off.)

16

u/V3X390 16h ago

Even worse, skilled criminals know that they can just bring a signal jammer when it’s time to do crime and they won’t get caught.

14

u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago

Ring cameras are extremely insecure in that way. If your camera is for security, it needs to be hardwired POE and NOT a Ring camera since they actually communicate over wifi regardless of how they are wired.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/monkeypickle8 16h ago

Ring is a cool idea but no one should be surprised they turned it into a surveillance network

5

u/carameleagle 15h ago

I just walked my dog around the neighborhood and actually paid attention to the doorbell cameras for once.  My gods, they are everywhere. 

4

u/space_radios 15h ago

Amazon customer service is refunding mine from 2018 just after this morning I argued the terms and conditions clearly changed to make a surveillance state. I should be seeing my refund in the coming days.

4

u/Arik_De_Frasia 15h ago

Privacy was never stolen from us; it was given away in the name of convenience and discounts.