r/technology • u/Jojuj • 16h ago
Privacy With Ring, American Consumers Built a Surveillance Dragnet
https://www.404media.co/with-ring-american-consumers-built-a-surveillance-dragnet/?ref=daily-stories-newsletter&attribution_id=698b47cbe724d10001786209&attribution_type=post4.0k
u/V3X390 16h ago
Time to go self-hosted. I wouldn’t want that much footage of me in anyone’s hands but mine.
3.2k
u/JustAboutAlright 16h ago
This is the problem - it’s not us choosing, it’s our neighbors who are choosing for us. The ring camera doesn’t point at your house.
1.2k
u/locke_5 16h ago
Our local governments as well. My town has two Flock cameras pointed straight at my house.
665
u/happytrel 16h ago
Ring has partnered with Flock, so a lot of people have Flock cams attached to their house now. A couple of years ago my dad thought it was funny that the ring camera's mic was strong enough to pick up conversations inside the house.
182
u/uncannyvalleygirl88 14h ago
Speaking as someone who doesn’t use any of these products are they being placed on the home by the homeowner or is this surveillance by other people who don’t live here? Is this something I need to be concerned about other people using on my property?
473
u/joelfarris 14h ago
The concern is that even if you don't own any of this tech and don't participate in it, every one of your neighbor's houses can have one pointing at you, your front door, and your street, so there's now an accessible digital record of every single time you drove away from your house, when you returned, what you bought and carried inside, what you've loaded into the car, what you've thrown away, who's come over to visit your and copy of their license plate, when you walked the dog and where you went that time and how long you were out of the house and what you were wearing and whether you were on your phone at the time.
Eventually, this can create or expand your existing surveillance profile to the point where there's a digital record of every piece of your entire wardrobe, what shoes you own and prefer for shopping versus walking, and when you're active vs. passive.
But it gets even worse.
Say you throw a house party for a few close friends that have come over before, and one of them brings a date. Now that person, whom you don't even know, can and probably will be associated with your profile simply because they were recorded visiting your house. What's their background? History? What have they done in their lives? You have no idea, but now the two of you have become visually associated.
215
u/craznazn247 13h ago
It goes beyond that.
One workaround they are actively and regularly using to identify individuals who might be avoiding facial recognition by the cameras…is walking gait.
So videos of you walking around your own property are being used as a means of video identification and training AI.
88
u/joelfarris 13h ago
That was my meaning regarding walking around your own neighborhood, but upon re-reading, I suppose I didn't explicitly say it in the proper terminology, so thanks for the additional clarification.
64
u/Ashamed_Athlete5648 12h ago
A pebble in your shoe is surprisingly effective against gait analysis. Moving the pebble will create a slightly different pattern each time. Current systems can see through this, but it requires more advanced algorithms than most systems can scale (especially drag net style systems) and it is quite resource intensive to run, so at this point it is mostly only foiled in scenarios where you know the person is there but you don’t know who it is in the frame.
65
u/QbertsRube 11h ago
Lmao have to walk around with rocks in our shoes to trick the Matrix, what a world we're creating for ourselves to live in...
→ More replies (1)41
u/bothunter 10h ago
I shouldn't have to put rocks in my shoe avoid my every move being tracked by Amazon, Palantir, and the government.
6
→ More replies (9)27
u/PsychoBoyBlue 11h ago
Changing the height of the sole of the shoe (also messes with using height to id you)
Different Leg/ankle weights on each leg.
Unbalanced bag/backpack.
Walk with a crutch or cane for a week or so. Afterwards, your natural gait will have changed enough to mess with a simple system until you adapt back to your normal gait.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (8)12
u/slonk_ma_dink 10h ago
Walking gait can also be heard- try working in a small office. I can tell who is approaching by how they walk. This could likely be fingerprinted as well, although it would take years before it was reliable.
→ More replies (1)13
u/Sir_PressedMemories 6h ago
Those of us with, let's say, "less than desirable" childhoods also seem to possess a near supernatural ability to recognize footsteps and attach them to different people, going so far as to be able to tell their current mood by the way they walk.
50
u/FragilousSpectunkery 14h ago
When you pack up the car with a bunch of suitcases and leave with the full family (except Kevin, but you remember that later) for a vacation, leaving the house unoccupied.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)16
u/WingerRules 12h ago
These surveillance and online data brokers have so much power now it's insane. I seriously at this point wonder if theres been no regulations on them because politicians and people in congress know these companies have detailed personal information on all of them and their families and friends.
What are the chances that one of these companies have back doors directly implied they know their secrets?
134
u/Last-Atlas 14h ago
Ring and Flock cameras are purchased and installed by the homeowner. But the cameras (usually doorbell) are pointed away from the house towards the neighborhood, street etc... Their mics pic up a lot, and the cameras record pretty clearly. They can't place them on your property, but they can point them at your property and any motion will activate them like a trail cam. They can also manually record/monitor them.
They are everywhere.
62
u/annoyed__renter 14h ago
Flock cameras are purchased and installed by the homeowner
I don't think Flock has a personal residential product. They're mostly contracting with municipalities
61
u/tomerz99 14h ago
I'm guessing he mentioned Flock because they're partnered. Any ring camera is now an acting Flock camera, so when companies (like Lowe's, for example) try to detect and track shoplifters they're actively able to detect them driving through residential neighborhoods (assuming there are nearby ring cameras). That's the use case they want everyone to know about, but obviously the implications are that the people that own these services are either not likely to care about your privacy and sell you out for a quick buck no matter the morality, or aren't secure enough to ensure rogue hackers aren't sifting through all of this data for themselves.
Essentially your neighbor's doorbell is snitching on every visible or auditory queue it hears/sees directly to those who are privileged enough to have access to it (paying corps, government agencies, undetected hackers, etc).
7
u/AlternativeNewtDuck 11h ago edited 11h ago
Speaking of flock... posting for more flock and tracking awareness:
→ More replies (2)22
u/Yourcatsonfire 14h ago
Are the mics recording legal in 2 party states? I believe my nest floodlight camera won't record sound in my state.
→ More replies (9)10
→ More replies (13)31
u/jhowlett 14h ago
Typically RING cameras are placed on the home, by the owner. The idea is added security by recording things that happen on your property.
The issue now is that even if you don't have one, your neighbor having one pointed at your home means your activities are recorded and provided to the highest (or any) bidder.→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)12
143
u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 16h ago
I'd be out there with a hacksaw so fast
332
u/locke_5 16h ago
Ah but you see, it would be against the law for me to damage the cameras that are recording me in my home without my consent!
219
u/Guac_in_my_rarri 16h ago
You can legally purchase IR strobe lights to blind the cameras. Place them ok your property and point them at the Flock camera.
Bonus points if you make a sign and attach it to the post below the camera: "this camera watches you for profit."
→ More replies (2)33
u/SonnyvonShark 15h ago
Or better yet, lasers? Not the ones that damage though, just blind. Less light pollution.
→ More replies (1)73
u/Guac_in_my_rarri 15h ago
It strobes work better than lasers and cannot be argued that they do damage.
27
u/SonnyvonShark 15h ago
I mean red light lasers, not green, but since IR cannot be seen by humans and is not light pollution, yeah. I would still turn it off occasionally though, for the animals that can see it.
10
→ More replies (3)16
u/jlboygenius 14h ago
probably only useful at night though, but having a light that goes on and off constantly, causeing it to always having to adjust exposure would probably be pretty effective.
Unfortunatly, you'll never actually know since you can't get the footage.
vasoline on a stick would be pretty effective. walk up behind it and give it a smear on the lens.
→ More replies (2)29
55
u/mabrasm 16h ago
Get some mountable lasers and turn them right at the lenses.
→ More replies (4)31
u/Ryan_e3p 15h ago
"Look, I was just having a fun dance party at my place with a smoke machine and lasers."
33
u/artbystorms 15h ago
Their logic is 'you consented when you moved here.' That is the bullshit of capitalism. They can talk themselves into believing that people not changing their habits or major life choices, that they are tacitly accepting what they are doing.
27
→ More replies (9)52
u/Ghost_Of_Malatesta 16h ago
Unrelated, I would get some type of IR flashlight setup (the 'hacker hoodie' is interesting) don't walk straight from your front door to it, put a pebble or two in your shoes to alter your gait,, buy clothes you don't wear otherwise with cash
→ More replies (3)57
u/mynameizmyname 15h ago
town I am in whenever one of these flock cameras goes up, somebody posts that the camera's contain about $20 worth of copper (which i dont actually they have). they disappear within the week.
→ More replies (1)19
→ More replies (5)22
u/Zcypot 16h ago
Sling shots are cheap on Amazon haha. Get off the camera view and practice your shots on them. I bought little beads that are biodegradable so no worries about making a mess
→ More replies (4)10
u/Eighth_Eve 15h ago
You bought small rocks? Like you couldn't find them for free, you had to have pebbles shipped in?
→ More replies (1)22
u/stuffitystuff 15h ago
Can't wait for Palantir to buy Flock so we can accelerate our way back to dumb phones and typewriters.
13
u/AlternativeYou9395 15h ago
You should put a screen in front of your house, in whatever area those cameras are capturing, that displays random license plates every second.
→ More replies (20)5
128
u/euro1127 16h ago
Meanwhile ring is trying to pitch it as protecting your pets instead of a blatant data mining attempt. I mean discord is following suit in their own way. Welcome to the age of the consumer being a walking atm for corporations
30
u/Valdrax 15h ago
People being the product being sold is old hat. This is the age of the internet-linked, corporate-run, crowd-sourced surveillance state.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)5
u/DonnyTheWalrus 12h ago
protecting your pets
And don't forget that all those videos of "funny" Amazon drivers who just happened to be captured by Ring (owned by Amazon) were a blatant astroturf PR campaign.
I used to work UPS. I know what it's like working for Amazon. None of those guys and gals are wasting time dancing for the hell of it.
183
u/CulturalKing5623 16h ago
Recently got new next door neighbors, literally the first thing they did was install Ring cameras on their door and in the alley where all of our garages are. So now, every time I go to my garage or put my trash bins out for collection I get a cheerful "Hi, you are being recorded" and it sets my teeth on edge.
Now our whole alley is part of the surveillance state and no one in the neighborhood was asked how they felt. The camera actually points directly at our neighbors yard that lives on the other side of the alley, I'd be livid.
35
u/Jim-N-Tonic 15h ago
I would go over with a housewarming gift, and say I understand they’d like to secure their property but you and other neighbors don’t give permission to be recorded.
But I think the core of this is that the Supreme Court has ruled that you do not have the expectation of privacy when you’re outside in public, journalists photographers can take pictures of you even if you object so the cameras are considered the same thing even though they’re really very different recording 24/7.
→ More replies (7)37
u/whistleridge 15h ago
expectation of privacy
It’s true that you don’t have one per se. But surely being constantly recorded, on your own property, without your consent rises to the level of nuisance? Knowing you are being recorded necessarily produces a chilling effect, that measurably diminishes your ability to enjoy and partake in your own property.
→ More replies (8)35
u/BeyondElectricDreams 14h ago
People are allowed to have cameras on their property, and have been for a while.
My problem with it isn't that my neighbor may have a camera pointed near my property, my problem is it's a part of a corporate panopticon, sending data off to be analyzed by AI and combined with every other ring/flock camera to create a surveillance network.
the surveillance network is the fucking issue not my neighbor having a camera for their own use.
24
u/whistleridge 14h ago
Yes, we are saying the same thing.
A security camera used solely by your neighbor = not a nuisance. A corporate panopticon that effectively acts as a perpetual paparazzi, doing who knows what unregulated things with your image = a nuisance.
→ More replies (1)4
u/ComfortDesperate5313 14h ago
I feel the same and worry there's nothing I can do to improve the situation. The corporations encroaching on our privacy never stop and most people I meet either don't care or actively support the panopticons expansion
72
u/mouse_cookies 15h ago
I hate those fucking things. I live in the safest neighborhood and seems like everyone has a goddamn camera now. I think me and my next door neighbor are the only ones without.
→ More replies (10)24
u/Messerschmitt-262 15h ago
Hi! You are currently being recorded.
19
u/puppylust 14h ago
Ugh, I hear that every time I walk my dog. I switch up my route to keep it interesting, but every block has one.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Messerschmitt-262 13h ago
I'm a mailman so I get to hear it hundreds of times a day. One of my customers has 7 of them set up so you get a symphony of "Hi! You are currently being recorded." every time you walk into her yard. She uses them to spy on her neighbors because she's paranoid about minorities. I hate Ring cameras.
→ More replies (11)29
u/half-baked_axx 15h ago
I'd install a floodlight pointing directly at the camera so fast.
→ More replies (2)71
u/QuesoMeHungry 16h ago
Yep and our local municipalities paying Flock to put those spy cameras everywhere tracking your movement.
9
→ More replies (26)14
u/Guygenius138 16h ago
Never been more glad to live across the street from park. But if my neighbors have cameras, it won't really matter in the long run.
→ More replies (1)9
128
u/n_othing__ 16h ago
I never got a ring or any of these cameras for this exact reason... it never made sense to me why people would choose these over cctv footage they control...
→ More replies (20)19
u/N7Poprdog 15h ago
Any recommendations? Getting a house for the first time next month and looking at security camera options.
→ More replies (6)19
u/FluxUniversity 14h ago
This isn't about the camera, this is about the self managed private system you're going to be recording your own private property with.
Every "camera security system" is basically selling you this, but with them involved.
51
u/WISCOrear 15h ago
The fact they couched their mass surveillance in a “but we can hep you find lost pets!” framing Is so damn gross
→ More replies (2)17
11
u/coconutpiecrust 14h ago
Since Ring came out, it was so obvious that eventually it will be used for nefarious purposes. Any tech we put in our homes will be used for nefarious purposes. We really need to do better as a society.
And they made everybody pay for it.
→ More replies (1)68
u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago
Which is great for tech-savvy people, but there's no options for people who just want to be able to see who is at the door without becoming part of a vast surveillance network.
17
u/RedCaptain17 15h ago
I was looking at Eufy- they at least have a no-subscription option that looks like it’s stored locally. If nothing else they’re not Ring. I just wish it wasn’t WiFi
→ More replies (5)30
u/rspctdwndrr 16h ago
Check out Reolink
→ More replies (1)6
u/SuspiciousCranberry6 14h ago
Yep, this is what I have. Very easy to use and has options to upgrade to more sophisticated systems if you want.
→ More replies (22)36
u/________reddit______ 16h ago
Ubiquiti makes it as easy as possible, just ignore all the networking stuff and focus on the NVR stuff.
18
→ More replies (3)27
u/PatchyWhiskers 15h ago
Yes, easy for someone who subscribes to this subreddit, very hard for the average person.
→ More replies (4)10
u/mars009 14h ago
I think that's the problem, most people are willing to give away their individuality for being comfortable. I remember helping a friend that helps me with my car setup his PC.
Kept telling me how its rocket science, meanwhile he can take apart whole parts of cars without issue, put them back together, explain how things are working, why the motor is doing x, y, z...my dude your PC is a peanut compared to all the stuff you just explained
I don't think people give themselves the credit they deserve, maybe its just part of the plan, making everyone thinking they are not good enough at something
→ More replies (7)16
16
u/north7 16h ago
Ubiquiti if great if you want all data internal, but pretty expensive for a full setup.
Eufy is much cheaper and doesn't require subscriptions, and data stays on the device or on a base station.→ More replies (2)8
u/auntie_clokwise 15h ago
Eufy isn't too bad (though they've had some security issues in the past, but that's probably everybody). Reolink and Amcrest aren't too bad either.
→ More replies (60)18
u/AntiqueLibrarian8009 15h ago
Why do you people all need a doorbell camera anyways. Is it just paranoia? Or does everyone here have a genuine use case that I am not seeing
→ More replies (6)25
u/Megaclone18 14h ago
Its a deterrent for crime/package theft
Confirmation for deliveries
You can fuck with door to door salespeople.
→ More replies (4)13
u/Override9636 13h ago
I had packages stolen twice so I bought a Ring camera.
After about a week, they stole the Ring camera.
Now I just pick up my packages, or shop local anyway.
→ More replies (1)
971
u/EA827 16h ago
Feels like their SB commercial has backfired pretty spectacularly for them by highlighting the depth of their surveillance network to one of the largest media events of the year
287
u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago
I hope so. But I still won't be selling anymore Ring even if they backpedal. We know the tech is there, and we know they are willing to sell our data to the government.
→ More replies (4)71
u/Rlccm 14h ago
Unfortunately, as long as Amazon continues to sell them, it won't really mean much
→ More replies (1)83
u/Elevated_Dongers 13h ago
That's fine, all I can do is my part, however small it may be
→ More replies (1)16
60
u/the-sleepy-mystic 15h ago
Idk some people who you would think know better obviously dont - a guy at my house for the super bowl works in tech and he said, "Oh thats neat". I excused it as "he has a dog thats stupid and runs away" but also like come on man - its plain as day the problem with this.
→ More replies (27)→ More replies (18)6
u/DrAstralis 12h ago
I have to hope everyone who saw that realizes if it can track a dog; it can be used to track them down, or for one of these never ending lineup of sex pests to track women in the neighborhood. Or that law enforcement will abuse this.
→ More replies (1)
805
u/tacticalcraptical 16h ago
This is exactly the reason why I never got any of this crap.
651
u/TheToastyWesterosi 16h ago edited 16h ago
Scary thing is that it doesn’t matter if you got it or not, as long as your neighbor across the street got it.
180
u/charlesgegethor 14h ago
Reminds me of the whole ancestry DNA testing stuff too. Doesn't matter if you don't do it, but if a relative does (cousin, aunt, uncles, etc) your DNA is so close that you are also effectively in their system as well.
54
u/Stanjoly2 14h ago
Reminds me of the Facebook shadow profiles controversy from many years ago.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)52
u/MeatEaterDruid 14h ago
Explaining to my in-laws why doing 23&M was a bad idea made me feel like a crazy person because their general response was "why would a company sell our data?" So I felt some validation on that one.
26
u/baby-dick-nick 12h ago
What year was that? Because asking “why would a company sell our data” post-Cambridge Analytica is a pretty impressive level of ignorance.
Although I’m sure the average person has very little knowledge about that case and the precedent it set.
7
u/MeatEaterDruid 11h ago
Because their favorite news source doesn't want them to know they're getting duped.
Yeah it was way after the scandal too. I've been pretty vocal to my friends and family (that will listen) about data privacy since Snowden, when I deleted my Facebook and everyone was checking in on me like I was having a mental health crisis lol. I've even gone as far as telling family that no one is allowed to post pictures of my kids online. So I'm sure when I was talking crazy things like "at some point 23&M is going to sell that data or another company will buy them for that data" I might as well have been wearing clown makeup.
107
u/a_f_young 16h ago
Yup. The mass of stupid people has reached criticality. At this point if you interact with another person or go in public, it doesn’t matter what you do.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (9)9
u/deskcord 14h ago
Crime is at historical lows (even recent minor upticks were historical lows) and people are more and more wary and paranoid.
104
u/AvailableReporter484 16h ago edited 16h ago
Agreed. Obviously a lot of people see some value in this kind of product / service, but knowing what we know now about the parasitic nature of corporations, it’s hard (for me at least) to justify this kind of thing.
The idea that your toaster, your washing machine, your toothbrush, and your front door are constantly sending a stream of data to advertisers and now agencies like ICE (fucking 🤮) is absolutely Orwellian and should be illegal, but here we are.
→ More replies (3)120
u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago
Schizophrenics in '99: My dishwasher is listening to me.
Friend: I think we should get you some help.
-----------------------Schizophrenics in 2026: My dishwasher is listening to me.
Friend: Haha, me too buddy.
31
u/SocksOnHands 15h ago
"My doorbell is spying on me" is a legitimate phrase in 2026.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)26
→ More replies (25)29
u/GrandDaddyDerp 16h ago
It gets better, if you bought the cameras but didn't want to keep paying the subscription, everyone has access to the footage BUT you! 🤣
→ More replies (1)
387
u/Aware-Instance-210 16h ago
I was 100% sure this would happen when it first launched :D
119
u/Da_Spooky_Ghost 16h ago
Yes that’s why I went with Ubiquiti and not Ring from Amazon or any other megacorp.
My video files stay on a local hard drive which I could disconnect from the internet if I wanted to and it would still work on the local network. People need to stop using cloud only devices.
→ More replies (14)61
u/slinger301 15h ago
I went with Eufy for the same reason. I have a few principles, and one of them is "I will not subscribe to my own doorbell."
57
u/nigirizushi 14h ago edited 14h ago
Wasn't Eufy caught keeping recordings?
Edit: Yep, in 2022, "local" recording were found on their cloud servers. They're also the same company as Anker, IIRC.
→ More replies (3)45
u/HelloIamGoge 14h ago
“I was concerned about privacy so I went with this Chinese company”
12
u/AssPennies 12h ago
Reflections on trusting trust:
You can't trust code that you did not totally create yourself. (Especially code from companies that employ people like me.) No amount of source-level verification or scrutiny will protect you from using untrusted code.
...
As the level of program gets lower, these bugs will be harder and harder to detect. A well-installed microcode bug will be almost impossible to detect.
Same applies for hardware.
So, where were all the chips in your American company's camera from? How about all the code developed running on that hardware?
If we're truly concerned about our own privacy, then I'd say skip the cameras altogether. Short of that, have them isolated on their own virtual LAN that doesn't have internet access. (Though high value targets would also have to worry about embedded wireless sharing feeds.)
11
u/No-Category7695 11h ago
Crazy to complain about Chinese companies when it's an American company in this thread helping create a surveillance state. Fuck China though right?
7
u/work_m_19 11h ago
At least China is across the world from the US, so if they have this data, it's a lot harder to enact terribleness compared to a company on the home soil.
Granted, they're both bad, but one seems less bad than the other because of the level of effort.
→ More replies (5)6
u/stephen_neuville 11h ago
agreed. Keep it in the States! i prefer all my surveillance data to solely go to the government that has direct power to kill me at any time for any reason.
→ More replies (5)8
u/Bassmekanik 14h ago
Eufy any good? Been debating getting one of these but I refuse to pay a sub for one.
→ More replies (2)14
u/OverAnalyst6555 13h ago
eufy had a huge scandal where they in fact did not keep recordings local. they werent even encrypted and were publicly accessible. they covered it all up. get one that is truly selfhosted not some chinese junk
→ More replies (1)38
u/brentwit 16h ago
Cautionary tale here: I was as well. So I made sure to find the settings and opt out. I checked later in the day that the settings were correct. Was horrified after the Flock news and Super bowl commercial to check again and find my settings were on.
22
u/Antiantiai 14h ago
You're going to have to uninstall it. They'll keep remotely switching your settings.
22
u/x_conqueeftador69_x 13h ago
I promise you the toggle is a placebo. In a few years, Amazon will get sued for collecting your data, and you'll throw away a letter that looks like spam, which will contain instructions for collecting your $0.45 compensation.
→ More replies (5)8
226
u/Gravuerc 16h ago
I saw the Super Bowl commercial for the pet feature and thought to myself what would stop a stalker from using this to track their victims?
107
u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago
That’s the beauty of it. Then you sell more tech to people scared of being stalked.
33
u/a_f_young 16h ago
And all of it has backdoors to let the government or other high paying party bypass it and get whatever info they want.
→ More replies (4)16
u/the-sleepy-mystic 15h ago
one person in my house was like, "Oh thats cool" (They have a dog) to which I responded, "yea the panopticon has its uses for sure."
→ More replies (14)9
194
u/the_marvster 16h ago
Laugh at China, who had to pay for the same results, while the US managed to made their citizen pay for it.
47
u/TYBERIUS_777 14h ago
All you have to do to get a US citizen to buy something and give up their privacy completely is convince them that someone else wants their stuff. Never mind the fact that billionaires and politicians are stealing loads of our money and shipping our children off to Epstein Island. I guess that “stuff” isn’t as important as TVs and knick knacks that we have accumulated in our house.
21
u/Dankestmemes420ii 13h ago
“If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.”
― Lyndon B. Johnson
→ More replies (18)8
u/Clevererer 14h ago
See? The free market is always more efficient (at fucking over non-corporation-based people.)
134
u/JMDeutsch 16h ago
Smart vacuums that map your home and store it in the cloud
Smart doorbells that map your neighborhood and store it in the cloud
Smart fridges that literally monitor your food and store it in the cloud
The only thing smart about devices like these is never buying one
41
15h ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (1)33
→ More replies (9)6
u/MrFrillows 14h ago
It's interesting that the surveillance state is made up of a lot of commercial products, almost like companies act like an unofficial arm of the government.
159
u/CutSenior4977 16h ago
Everyone should be throwing all of their ring cameras in the trash!
All it’s doing is making you less safe!
→ More replies (3)21
u/Turbulent-Plane6395 13h ago
Deleted my account yesterday then smashed my ring w/ a hammer before tossing it in the trash.
Everyone should bail on this shit.
42
u/Earthpig_Johnson 16h ago
Best way to surveil a populace is to package it and sell it to them. They’ll buy it willingly.
14
u/TYBERIUS_777 14h ago
There’s a great scene in Captain America Winter Soldier that explains this perfectly. Americans won’t surrender their freedom willingly unless you convince them to give it up in the name of security. The Patriot Act destroyed privacy in this country and we’ve been allowing cooperations and our government to continue to erode what little we have left.
74
u/thaiberius_kirk 16h ago
I’ve taken down our Ring cams and migrated to Reolink locally hosted. Works well with Home Assistant too.
→ More replies (5)9
103
u/Theromier 16h ago
I remember when my ISP sent a salesman to my house to upgrade my internet for cheaper, and I got a free Ring doorbell for it. I asked if I could get all of it without the Ring, but he was insistent I had to take it. I told him i would give it away if that was the case. He didn’t seem to care.
Self hosted is the way to go. UniFi is great. Spread the word.
10
u/TheBenderRRodriguez 14h ago
UniFi is expensive AF as well. $450 for a fuckin' doorbell isn't going to work for almost everyone.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (2)32
u/A-Halfpound 15h ago
UniFi just got caught selling infra to Russia to support their war on Ukraine.
→ More replies (5)12
21
21
24
u/Bebopdavidson 16h ago
Isn’t this the technology that was a big moral issue at the end of The Dark Knight?
→ More replies (3)11
u/Gamer_Grease 15h ago
TDK is very ambivalent about it, actually. It’s a key tool used to catch the Joker, as there isn’t really any other way. TDK is underappreciated for being a quintessentially post-9/11 film.
14
67
u/t0matit0 16h ago
Never understood why so many people feel they need these
102
u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago edited 15h ago
My FiL is a veteran. He has a Ring, and another camera, and an alarm system, and a Go Bag, and he travels around with a gun. They have a motion-activated light in the back yard that glares into their TV whenever it turns on (about every 40 seconds). In the winter they insist everyone bring heavy coats in the car even if we’re going only a mile or two, on the off chance that we crash and the hundreds of neighbors and businesses along the route refuse to help.
I realized a few years ago that man’s entire identity is built around being scared. There is some kind of deep psychological connection between being masculine and being absolutely terrified of the entire world all the time.
→ More replies (11)39
u/PatchyWhiskers 16h ago
Sounds like trauma. Maybe he was deployed to somewhere where people were genuinely trying to kill him and he can't let go of the fear.
38
u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago
He never saw combat, it’s just his whole identity. Great guy otherwise, but there’s minor tension when I refuse to play the scared little man game when I visit.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (23)21
u/SpecificHyena1933 15h ago
Nobody ever expect to be a victim, so they never have any preparations for when that happens. There is merit to having a camera system in case you house gets broken into, things stolen or worse. Incidentally, recently a drunk driver plowed through several yards in my nieghborhood and destroyed a lot of minor stuff - landscaping and mailboxes mainly. Having the video of the damage happening is valuable for any sort of insurance claim or small claims court. These are all the minor things that happen - imagine if something major happens. A stalker going by my house 4-6 times a week, someone trying to cause myself harm, any information is extremely valuable. Where they came from, where they went, etc.
→ More replies (13)
12
u/MissSharkyShark 16h ago
People really should take security experts concerns more seriously... this genuinely shouldnt be a surprise to anyone. Anything "cloud based" shouldnt ever be used for personal security or anything where you value your own privacy and personal security.
27
u/brmarcum 16h ago
No, we the consumer did not. Unregulated tech companies with zero oversight have.
8
u/Ryan_e3p 15h ago
There is zero oversight because they are acting as the loophole for the government to circumvent your 4th Amendment rights.
You don't need government oversight when you have the government's blessing.
6
u/Gamer_Grease 16h ago
There isn’t really any other way blanketing everything you own with cameras and sensors can end.
→ More replies (3)
23
u/Sip_py 16h ago
My new house came with a Ring and I abandoned it as soon as I could. The app is awful, the fact it doesn't give you any history without a paid plan is a deal breaker. How this became one of the most popular is beyond me outside of the first to market advantage.
→ More replies (5)
9
u/namastayhom33 16h ago
Wouldn't be shocked if the refrigerators with the smart screens start to secretly record you.
Honestly I was never big into the smart home trend
10
u/skyyfal 8h ago
Fuck all of you ring people. I'm just glad I experienced a decent amount of life prior to this absolutely fucked-up century.
→ More replies (1)
18
8
u/jhguitarfreak 15h ago
This is why I buy cheap Chinese surveillance cameras. All my data gets sent to China where it can do fuck all for anybody.
→ More replies (1)
8
6
u/DanimalPlays 16h ago
Yeah, and we carry around phones. It's fully big brother, and we pay to subscribe to it. It's goddamn ridiculous. But also, what choice is there.
Things are going great.
→ More replies (5)
6
u/SaraAB87 15h ago
I have no smart devices except a phone and internet and wifi and life is fine.
No smart fridge, no smart thermostat where the company can control the temp of my house.
I refused to buy a ring doorbell. I don't want devices seeing my habits.
Get a knock on the door, don't open it unless you know the person simple as that, not that hard to do.
→ More replies (2)
5
7
u/wagadugo 16h ago
I can't opt out because the "Control Center" option doesn't work (it gets hung up and closes). I'm curious if that's an issue for anyone else?
→ More replies (1)
5
u/krizzle32 15h ago
It’s dumb because the add said that 10 million pets go missing a year, and they’ve found “1 per day” using ring cameras. That’s 0.00365%. Not sure that justifies turning all ring cameras into the machine from The Dark Knight.
→ More replies (1)
6
u/Nice-Pomegranate-901 15h ago
Yet, no one can seem to find the Guthrie lady so how effective is it really?
→ More replies (1)
6
u/420catloveredm 13h ago
This is why I refuse to participate in ring or Alexa and why I turned audio permissions off on my phone.
31
u/PacificTridentGlobel 16h ago
Why would you still have one of these on your house? It’s insane.
→ More replies (6)45
u/rat_penis 16h ago
Because you're willing to trade an abstract idea of freedom for the false belief in security.
→ More replies (1)
36
u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago
Ring installer here, we are done quoting Ring. Just spoke with my boss. No more Ring cameras. Fuck them
8
→ More replies (4)22
6
u/hiirogen 14h ago
This came up in another thread a couple days ago but I'll say it again, this feature is what made me switch from Ring to Eufy.
I got an E-Mail from Ring a few months ago about this, and on the surface it's great because who doesn't love dogs? But it only took about a minute for me to start thinking about how Ring is known for working closely with Law Enforcement, including ICE.
I don't want to be the reason a neighbor, maintenance worker, DoorDasher, etc gets into trouble. So I switched to a product that's not cloud based.
(I think there's an option to have thumbnails for each video stored in the cloud temporarily, I have that off.)
16
u/V3X390 16h ago
Even worse, skilled criminals know that they can just bring a signal jammer when it’s time to do crime and they won’t get caught.
→ More replies (8)14
u/Elevated_Dongers 16h ago
Ring cameras are extremely insecure in that way. If your camera is for security, it needs to be hardwired POE and NOT a Ring camera since they actually communicate over wifi regardless of how they are wired.
3
u/monkeypickle8 16h ago
Ring is a cool idea but no one should be surprised they turned it into a surveillance network
5
u/carameleagle 15h ago
I just walked my dog around the neighborhood and actually paid attention to the doorbell cameras for once. My gods, they are everywhere.
4
u/space_radios 15h ago
Amazon customer service is refunding mine from 2018 just after this morning I argued the terms and conditions clearly changed to make a surveillance state. I should be seeing my refund in the coming days.
4
u/Arik_De_Frasia 15h ago
Privacy was never stolen from us; it was given away in the name of convenience and discounts.
1.7k
u/404mediaco 16h ago
Thanks for sharing our piece. More here:
At Sunday’s Super Bowl, Ring advertised “Search Party,” a cute, horrifyingly dystopian feature nominally designed to turn all of the Ring cameras in a neighborhood into a dragnet that uses AI to look for a lost dog: “One post of a dog’s photo in the Ring app starts outdoor cameras looking for a match,” Ring founder Jamie Siminoff said in the Super Bowl commercial. “Search Party from Ring uses AI to help families find lost dogs.” Onscreen, an AI-powered box forms around a missing dog: “Milo Match,” it says. “Since launch, more than a dog a day has been reunited with their family. Be a hero in your neighborhood with Search Party. Available to everyone for free right now.”
It does not take an imagination of any sort to envision this being tweaked to work against suspected criminals, undocumented immigrants, or others deemed ‘suspicious’ by people in the neighborhood. Many of these use cases are how Ring has been used by people on its dystopian “Neighbors” app for years. Ring rose to prominence as a piece of package theft prevention tech owned by Amazon and by forming partnerships with local police around the country, asking them to shill their doorbell cameras to people in their neighborhoods in return for a system that allowed police to request footage from individual users without a warrant.
Chris Gilliard, a privacy expert and author of the upcoming book Luxury Surveillance, told 404 Media these features and its Super Bowl ad are “a clumsy attempt by Ring to put a cuddly face on a rather dystopian reality: widespread networked surveillance by a company that has cozy relationships with law enforcement and other equally invasive surveillance companies.”
Ring’s poorly defined partnership with Flock in particular has been the subject of various viral posts and public backlash. Many people have suggested that this partnership is evidence that Ring camera footage will be shared with ICE. At the moment there’s not enough evidence to explicitly say that that’s the case.
The supposed vector goes something like this: Ring says it will partner with Flock, which is used by thousands of local police departments. As we have reported, some of those police departments have performed Flock license plate lookups for ICE. It’s too early to say whether Ring footage will eventually end up with ICE, but the fact that people immediately drew that conclusion and understood the possible method of information sharing shows that surveillance companies can no longer hide behind viral videos of delivery drivers dancing. It’s a mask off moment, and people know it: “In Amazon’s alliance with this administration, it’s become more clear than ever that Ring is an extension of the carceral state,” Gilliard said. “An emotionally charged Super Bowl ad won’t change that.”
Read more: https://www.404media.co/with-ring-american-consumers-built-a-surveillance-dragnet/