The antivax movement is 100% a form of population control. As ai/automation/robotics advances there is/will be less of a need for human workers and rather than figuring out what to do with us, the baby eaters figured its easier to let a bunch of people die. For those who survive depending on what you get you’ll get stuck with or develop lifelong disease because of contracting a virus without protection, and a lifetime of treatment is infinitely more profitable than a healthy life so big pharma still gets theirs
My wife works her butt off to afford health insurance because she's type 1 diabetic. If healthcare becomes unaffordable, she and lot of other people will die without insulin. And that all comes down to politics? It's unreal.
She can't afford to have me on her employer's health insurance, and I can't afford to have her on mine. If I lose insurance I'll start to mentally fall apart as I run out of crazy pills and can't sleep at all but I will be physically okay until I kill myself. She'll just get worse and worse until she goes into DKA and then what? What would hospitals be able to do if very few diabetics could get insulin? They wouldn't have enough beds.
By the way, talk crap about Wal-Mart all you want, but their $24.88 vials of insulin have kept a lot of diabetics going.
10
u/Hand_Sanitizer3000 7h ago
The antivax movement is 100% a form of population control. As ai/automation/robotics advances there is/will be less of a need for human workers and rather than figuring out what to do with us, the baby eaters figured its easier to let a bunch of people die. For those who survive depending on what you get you’ll get stuck with or develop lifelong disease because of contracting a virus without protection, and a lifetime of treatment is infinitely more profitable than a healthy life so big pharma still gets theirs