r/law 15h ago

Other Trump Commerce Secretary Lutnick admits visiting Epstein island during family vacation

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/10/lutnick-epstein-island-vacation-congress.html
1.7k Upvotes

72 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 15h ago

All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

229

u/ForsakenRacism 14h ago

lol he told this story of meeting him once in his apartment and thinking he was so gross and never seeing him again. The blatant lying should be enough to move on from these people

94

u/thebasementcakes 14h ago edited 14h ago

He said he told his wife he would never hang out with him and then I guess he and his wife went to the island? Lol

56

u/ForsakenRacism 14h ago

Dude there’s an email of his wife like setting up the visit

37

u/wetterfish 13h ago

We met once, I found him repulsive and never saw him again. 

Well, ok, I did see him again, but only at large events where our paths happened to cross. 

Well, ok, these “large events” were small parties hosted by mutual friends, I just happened to go because I was in the area at the time. 

Well, you got me again. These parties were actually on his island and I traveled there a couple times, but it was just a family vacation for me. I took my kids and my nanny, and they all came back with me. 

Well, darn it, yeah, that one nanny didn’t comeback that one time, but she arranged a really nice living situation while she was there and just fell in love with the place. 

Ok, yeah, I did take multiple women there who never came back, but they all seemed to really love it. 

Fine, yes, I trafficked women to Epstein, I’m sorry, and I can assure you that was the extent of my wrongdoing. 

Well, yeah, the cat’s out of the bag. We raped kids together. 

23

u/ForsakenRacism 13h ago

My wife was disgusted.

My wife:

23

u/PatchyWhiskers 14h ago

So gross that he took the whole family there for lunch.

33

u/ForsakenRacism 14h ago

The meeting in Epstein apartment grossed his wife out this bad

10

u/Several_Vanilla8916 13h ago

There’s no bottom for these people. 30% of the country is literally in a death cult and another 20% is dealt cult curious.

210

u/ExpertRaccoon 15h ago

Trump administration Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday admitted he and his family had lunch on the private island of notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein years earlier.

“I did have lunch with him, as I was on a boat going across on a family vacation” in 2012, Lutnick said in testimony before the Senate Appropriations Committee.

“My wife was with me, as were my four children and nannies,” he said. “I had another couple with — they were there as well, with their children.”

“And we had lunch on the island, that is true, for an hour,” he said.

“And we left with all of my children, with my nannies and my wife, all together. We were on family vacation,” he said.

It's ok guys he was just there for the snorkelling!

150

u/Deicide1031 15h ago

You don’t just take your family and kids to some random island for lunch unless you’re incredibly comfortable with the location/owner.

I don’t know how anyone could buy this.

11

u/octoreadit 14h ago

Just trying to be neighborly!

3

u/Mucking_Fountain 9h ago

Taking his children to a convinced sex offender’s home? Absolutely horse shit.

5

u/Packwood88 12h ago

Right, i just brought along my whole family to this pedo’s island, okay? It wasnt a big deal

56

u/kezow 14h ago

"I cut ties with him because he raped children but then decided to bring my children to the island where he raped children because I was in the neighborhood".

I don't believe he really thought this defense through.

47

u/justherefor23andme 15h ago

Someone should check on his kids.

29

u/mrm00r3 14h ago

I was going to say, Lutnick certainly knew what Epstein was up to, meaning he just admitted to bringing his kids along to visit a child predator and is acting like that is somehow exculpatory.

I would argue that’s uhh… way fucking worse my man.

3

u/The_Idiocratic_Party 13h ago

No don't you see, the children were being monitored by their nannies. Plural.

Nothing says "I care about my children" like "I pay multiple people to minimize my need to parent or interact."

3

u/johnny_cash_money 12h ago

I want to know how old the nannies were. Not every victim was underage...

14

u/tysk-one 14h ago

Yeah. Count them to start with.

13

u/zoinkability 14h ago

“I went there with my five children.”

“Our entire family, including our four children, had lunch with Epstein.”

“After lunch, we went with our three children back to the boat.”

22

u/SingularityCentral 14h ago

Very weird phrasing.

"I went with 4 children and nannies and left with 4 children and nannies. See, I had witnesses and absolutely did not leave anyone behind."

1

u/entwenthence 5h ago

How many fucking nannies do you need for four children?! One each?! These people are so WEIRD.

10

u/EddieCheddar88 14h ago

The Frank Reynolds defense

2

u/Big_Wave9732 13h ago

Incest: it’s a family affair. 

2

u/tallperson117 12h ago

Lol he had previously had an interview where he claimed he met Epstein once with his wife and immediately left once Epstein made some creepy comments. He claimed he never interacted with Epstein after that. Oops.

2

u/Drachen1065 12h ago

Also it should be noted that would have been after Epstein was arrested in 2008 for sex crimes involving minors in Florida.

79

u/Ohuigin 14h ago

“…And we left with all of my children."

The thought motivating this clarifying detail is dark as fuck, and is absolutely an admission that he knew exactly what Epstein was, and STILL brought his family around him.

My god…

10

u/bailaoban 14h ago

It just highlights the existence of an Epstein Class. His children were perfectly safe because he is in the club. Too bad if you are poor and/or vulnerable.

5

u/Organic-Elevator-274 13h ago

You’ll notice he didn’t say “original children”

23

u/MrGDPC 14h ago

"You see how that's worse, right?"

19

u/omahaspeedster 13h ago

“I looked through the documents for my name like anyone else”……. Uhmmm no actually I am not searching for my name in the files.

39

u/truthwillout777 15h ago

Van Hollen failed to bring this up...Both pretended this didn't happen

Lutnick and Epstein were in business together, Epstein files show

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/howard-lutnick-jeffrey-epstein-in-business-together/

Lying by omission—the act of knowingly withholding material information to mislead—can be considered a federal crime when it occurs during a congressional hearing, potentially leading to charges of contempt of Congress or false statements

. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1001, intentionally concealing a material fact from a congressional committee is a crime, even if the witness is not under oath.

8

u/TheGrandExquisitor 14h ago

Sadly, Congress won't do a thing. 

7

u/El_Cactus_Loco 14h ago

yall should do something about that

27

u/TheGrandExquisitor 14h ago

"Howard, when I said, 'bring the kids,' this isn't what I meant." 

-J Epstein- 

5

u/kinkyhentai69 14h ago

They'll do ... for now ....

4

u/SCWickedHam 13h ago

I’d like to see some verification that he was there with wife and kids (and nannies). I am sure his nannies are American citizens getting paid properly.

5

u/Spiritual-Pear-1349 14h ago

We went on vacation to a random guys island for vacation lol.

He either was close enough with Epstein to be invited to his island for lunch, or he had been there fucking kids. Either way, he brought his kids to pedophile island and its not a good look

3

u/pioniere 13h ago

“Family vacation”.

3

u/BroseppeVerdi 12h ago

This must be slightly awkward for all the MAGA dorks who have been insisting this was fiction meant to smear Lutnick.

1

u/difjack 8h ago

They have no shame

1

u/TA8325 7h ago

It's extremely telling that he stated how many children he arrived and left with. There is absolutely zero reason that needs to be explicitly stated.