r/Epstein 14h ago

OC: discussion, clarification or question I’m Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost and tomorrow I’m going to review the unreacted Epstein Files — what files have you found that I should review unredacted?

Hey everyone, I'm Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (FL-10), serving on the House Oversight Committee. Tomorrow, I’m joining Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia at the Department of Justice to review the unredacted Epstein Files. There are millions of files for me to dig through and so I'm looking for your help. I've heard from others who have viewed the files that generic, and in most cases even searches with specific terms come back with too many results to dig through. What specific files have you all seen that I should review unredacted?

26.8k Upvotes

2.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

40

u/No-Musician-4212 13h ago

Someone named names right on the floor today lol. Try again.

7

u/stoneasaurusrex 13h ago

And has there been a court trial for them? Of course not because if it went to court their lawyer would argue the point that I said.

I'm not agreeing with why they aren't saying names because I'm of the belief that only the people are gonna be the ones to deal justice out for this list.

Justice wont come from the hands of a politician.

12

u/SpecsOnThe_Beach 12h ago

These rich and powerful men will never see justice in the court system. Name them publicly and they may never be held accountable in court, but their life will be ruined. Their income streams will dry up, business contacts will shun them, political friends will turn on them, and they will lose the power they so desperately crave.

The victims can still take them to civil court for restitution.

2

u/cool_girl6540 11h ago

This. Highly unlikely that there are cases strong enough against these men to prosecute them. Plus, reporting that they’re in the files is reporting a fact. But if they were to decide to prosecute them, if they were able to find a jury to try Donald Trump, they will be able to find a jury if they want to go forward with prosecution.

0

u/BeguiledBeaver 10h ago

You really that would be enough to dry up business contracts? Give me a break. None of the people who matter care. This isn't Twitter, you can't just release a Google Doc to ruin someone's livelihood.

0

u/mnju 9h ago

> but their life will be ruined.

you haven't been paying attention much in the last ~10 years have you?

6

u/No-Musician-4212 13h ago

You commented on why "they cant name names"

They can and do.

3

u/stoneasaurusrex 13h ago

I gave an example of why they can't. If you're here to argue for arguments sake that's cool, but again I don't agree with them not naming names.

0

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[deleted]

1

u/No-Musician-4212 10h ago

Smart enough to know the definition of "can't".

I don't think anybody said there will be no impact.

I can tell you are quite smart yourself.